Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020;42(2):110-117. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2019.1583244. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
: It is unclear that the difference in efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) on the length of hospital stay for both heart failure (HF) preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF) and reduced EF (HFrEF) patients.: We investigated 369 patients who were hospitalized with HF from February 2011 to June 2016 and initiated TLV. Patients who died in hospital, transferred hospital or clinical scenario 4 or 5 were excluded. Finally, we analyzed 108 patients with HFpEF and 96 patients with HFrEF. We evaluated the relationship between the length of hospital stay and the date of TLV initiation. Moreover, we compared the early use (within the median) and delayed use (the median or later) of TLV.: The date of TLV initiation was statistically associated with the length of hospital stay in both HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF: r = 0.625, P < 0.001, HFrEF: r = 0.618, P < 0.001). In HFpEF, the length of hospital stay in delayed use group was significantly longer than the early use group (22.2 ± 10.7 days and 38.1 ± 22.6 days, P < 0.001). The result was similar in HFrEF (22.0 ± 15.0 days and 32.1 ± 22.0 days, P = 0.008). On the other hand, there were no statistically significant differences in the length of hospital stay after initiation of TLV in both HFpEF and HFrEF. Other findings (including the severity of HF) were similar between the early use group and the delayed group in HFpEF and HFrEF.: The time until TLV initiation after hospitalization was related to the length of hospital stay in HFpEF and HFrEF patients.
:托伐普坦(TLV)对射血分数保留心力衰竭(HFpEF)和射血分数降低心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者住院时间的疗效差异尚不清楚。:我们调查了 2011 年 2 月至 2016 年 6 月因心力衰竭住院并开始使用 TLV 的 369 名患者。排除在医院死亡、转院或临床情况 4 或 5 的患者。最后,我们分析了 108 例 HFpEF 患者和 96 例 HFrEF 患者。我们评估了住院时间与 TLV 开始日期之间的关系。此外,我们比较了 TLV 的早期(中位数内)和延迟(中位数或更晚)使用。:TLV 开始日期与 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的住院时间均具有统计学相关性(HFpEF:r = 0.625,P < 0.001,HFrEF:r = 0.618,P < 0.001)。在 HFpEF 中,延迟使用组的住院时间明显长于早期使用组(22.2 ± 10.7 天和 38.1 ± 22.6 天,P < 0.001)。在 HFrEF 中也有类似的结果(22.0 ± 15.0 天和 32.1 ± 22.0 天,P = 0.008)。另一方面,在 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 中,TLV 开始后住院时间无统计学差异。HFpEF 和 HFrEF 中,早期使用组和延迟组的其他发现(包括心力衰竭的严重程度)相似。:住院后开始 TLV 的时间与 HFpEF 和 HFrEF 患者的住院时间有关。