Berridge Clara, Halpern Jodi, Levy Karen
a School of Social Work, University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , USA.
b School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley , California , USA.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Jan-Mar;10(1):55-62. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1568320. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Surveillance cameras are increasingly being deployed in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, with insufficient attention to what is ethically fraught about this way of assuaging concerns about abuse and other personnel challenges. With seven state laws now regulating camera monitoring and more on the way, it is urgent for us to consider the ethical implications of how we use technology to keep older adults safe. Drawing on findings from the first facility survey on this topic, we address three ethical issues: the risk that in-room cameras pose to residents' privacy and dignity, the risk of undermining care workers' sense of being fiduciaries for residents, and the probable extension of camera use by facilities to monitor staff and residents. We argue that with an aging population, intensifying strain on the care workforce, and ease of access to Web-connected cameras, this is a critical moment to address these ethical challenges.
养老院和辅助生活设施中越来越多地安装了监控摄像头,但对于这种缓解对虐待和其他人员问题担忧的方式所存在的伦理困境,却没有给予足够的关注。目前已有七项州法律对摄像头监控进行规范,且更多相关法律正在制定中,我们迫切需要考虑如何利用技术保障老年人安全所涉及的伦理问题。基于关于这一主题的首次设施调查结果,我们探讨三个伦理问题:室内摄像头对居民隐私和尊严构成的风险、损害护理人员作为居民受托人的责任感的风险,以及设施可能扩大摄像头使用范围以监控工作人员和居民的情况。我们认为,鉴于人口老龄化、护理劳动力压力加剧以及联网摄像头易于获取,这是应对这些伦理挑战的关键时刻。