• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近视进化限制了长期押注避险的效果。

Shortsighted Evolution Constrains the Efficacy of Long-Term Bet Hedging.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2019 Mar;193(3):409-423. doi: 10.1086/701786. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1086/701786
PMID:30794447
Abstract

To survive unpredictable environmental change, many organisms adopt bet-hedging strategies that are initially costly but provide a long-term fitness benefit. The temporal extent of these deferred fitness benefits determines whether bet-hedging organisms can survive long enough to realize them. In this article, we examine a model of microbial bet hedging in which there are two paths to extinction: unpredictable environmental change and demographic stochasticity. In temporally correlated environments, these drivers of extinction select for different switching strategies. Rapid phenotype switching ensures survival in the face of unpredictable environmental change, while slower-switching organisms become extinct. However, when both switching strategies are present in the same population, then demographic stochasticity-enforced by a limited population size-leads to extinction of the faster-switching organism. As a result, we find a novel form of evolutionary suicide whereby selection in a fluctuating environment can favor bet-hedging strategies that ultimately increase the risk of extinction. Population structures with multiple subpopulations and dispersal can reduce the risk of extinction from unpredictable environmental change and shift the balance so as to facilitate the evolution of slower-switching organisms.

摘要

为了应对不可预测的环境变化,许多生物采用了避险策略,这些策略最初是有代价的,但能提供长期的适应度收益。这些延迟适应度收益的时间范围决定了避险生物是否有足够的时间来实现它们。在本文中,我们研究了一种微生物的避险模型,其中有两种灭绝途径:不可预测的环境变化和种群随机波动。在时间相关的环境中,这些灭绝驱动因素选择了不同的转换策略。快速表型转换确保了在面对不可预测的环境变化时的生存,而转换较慢的生物则灭绝。然而,当同一群体中存在两种转换策略时,由有限种群大小引起的种群随机波动导致快速转换生物灭绝。因此,我们发现了一种新的进化自杀形式,即波动环境中的选择可以有利于避险策略,而这些策略最终会增加灭绝的风险。具有多个亚群和扩散的种群结构可以降低不可预测的环境变化带来的灭绝风险,并改变平衡,从而促进转换较慢的生物的进化。

相似文献

1
Shortsighted Evolution Constrains the Efficacy of Long-Term Bet Hedging.近视进化限制了长期押注避险的效果。
Am Nat. 2019 Mar;193(3):409-423. doi: 10.1086/701786. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Experimental evolution of bet hedging.风险对冲的实验性进化
Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):90-3. doi: 10.1038/nature08504.
3
Short-term insurance versus long-term bet-hedging strategies as adaptations to variable environments.短期保险与长期风险对冲策略作为适应多变环境的手段。
Evolution. 2019 Feb;73(2):145-157. doi: 10.1111/evo.13659. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
Bet-hedging strategies in expanding populations.扩张种群中的赌注策略。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Apr 18;15(4):e1006529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006529. eCollection 2019 Apr.
5
Bet hedging or not? A guide to proper classification of microbial survival strategies.是否存在赌注博弈?微生物生存策略的正确分类指南。
Bioessays. 2011 Mar;33(3):215-23. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000127. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
6
The role of migration in the evolution of phenotypic switching.迁移在表型转换进化中的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141677. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1677.
7
Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging.应对环境变化的模式和套期保值的难以捉摸的经验证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 7;278(1712):1601-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0176. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
8
Effect of compositional fluctuation on the survival of bet-hedging species.组成波动对风险分摊物种生存的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Nov 21;553:111270. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111270. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Bet-hedging in stochastically switching environments.随机切换环境中的风险对冲。
J Theor Biol. 2013 Nov 7;336:144-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
10
When sensing is gambling: An experimental system reveals how plasticity can generate tunable bet-hedging strategies.当感知成为一场赌博:一个实验系统揭示了可塑性如何产生可调谐的风险对冲策略。
Evolution. 2017 Apr;71(4):859-871. doi: 10.1111/evo.13199. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive evolutionary trajectories in complexity: Transitions between unicellularity and facultative differentiated multicellularity.复杂性中的适应性进化轨迹:单细胞性与兼性分化多细胞性之间的转变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2411692122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2411692122. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Adaptive Bet-Hedging Revisited: Considerations of Risk and Time Horizon.自适应贝叶斯套期保值再探:风险与时间跨度的考虑。
Bull Math Biol. 2020 Apr 4;82(4):50. doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00729-8.
3
Alternative responses to rare selection events are differentially vulnerable to changes in the frequency, scope, and intensity of environmental extremes.
对罕见选择事件的不同反应对环境极端情况的频率、范围和强度变化的脆弱性各不相同。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Sep 27;9(20):11752-11761. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5675. eCollection 2019 Oct.