Suppr超能文献

理解联邦合格健康中心选择和实施结直肠癌筛查干预措施所使用的流程:一项定性研究。

Understanding the processes that Federally Qualified Health Centers use to select and implement colorectal cancer screening interventions: a qualitative study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Community & Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2020 May 20;10(2):394-403. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz023.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is highly effective at reducing cancer-related morbidity and mortality, yet screening rates remain suboptimal. Evidence-based interventions can increase screening rates, particularly when they target multiple levels (e.g., patients, providers, health care systems). However, effective interventions remain underutilized. Thus, there is a pressing need to build capacity to select and implement multilevel CRC screening interventions. We report on formative research aimed at understanding how Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) staff select and implement CRC screening interventions, which will inform development of capacity-building strategies. We report the qualitative findings from a study that used a mixed methods design, starting with a quantitative survey followed by a qualitative study. In-depth interviews were conducted with 28 staff from 14 FQHCs in 8 states. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided interview questions and data analysis. Related to the CFIR process domain, few respondents described conducting formal assessments of factors contributing to low screening rates prior to planning their interventions. Many described engaging champions, implementation leaders, and external change agents. Few described a systematic approach to executing implementation plans beyond conducting plan-do-study-act cycles. Reflection and evaluation consisted primarily of reviewing Uniform Data System performance measures. Findings also include themes related to factors influencing these implementation processes. Although FQHCs are implementing CRC screening interventions, they are not actively targeting the multilevel factors influencing their CRC screening rates. Our findings on gaps in FQHCs' implementation processes will inform development of strategies to build capacity to select and implement multilevel CRC screening interventions.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查在降低癌症相关发病率和死亡率方面非常有效,但筛查率仍不理想。基于证据的干预措施可以提高筛查率,尤其是当它们针对多个层面(例如患者、提供者、医疗保健系统)时。然而,有效的干预措施仍然未得到充分利用。因此,迫切需要建立选择和实施多层面 CRC 筛查干预措施的能力。我们报告了一项旨在了解联邦合格的健康中心(FQHC)工作人员如何选择和实施 CRC 筛查干预措施的基础研究,这将为制定能力建设策略提供信息。我们报告了一项混合方法设计研究的定性结果,该研究首先进行了定量调查,然后进行了定性研究。对来自 8 个州的 14 个 FQHC 的 28 名工作人员进行了深入访谈。实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导了访谈问题和数据分析。与 CFIR 过程领域相关,很少有受访者在计划干预措施之前描述过对导致低筛查率的因素进行正式评估。许多人描述了参与拥护者、实施领导者和外部变革推动者。很少有人描述了执行实施计划的系统方法,除了进行计划-执行-研究-行动循环之外。反思和评估主要包括审查统一数据系统绩效指标。调查结果还包括影响这些实施过程的因素的主题。尽管 FQHC 正在实施 CRC 筛查干预措施,但它们并没有积极针对影响其 CRC 筛查率的多层次因素。我们关于 FQHC 实施过程中的差距的发现将为制定选择和实施多层面 CRC 筛查干预措施的能力建设战略提供信息。

相似文献

10
Understanding quality improvement collaboratives through an implementation science lens.
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105859. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105859. Epub 2019 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

3
Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241259915. doi: 10.1177/21501319241259915.
6
Twenty years of collaborative research to enhance community practice for cancer prevention and control.
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01700-3. Epub 2023 May 16.
9
Stakeholder and Equity Data-Driven Implementation: a Mixed Methods Pilot Feasibility Study.
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01442-9. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
10
Adoption of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Mammography Screening Adherence in Safety Net Clinics.
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;9:748361. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.748361. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Building Capacity for Evidence-Based Public Health: Reconciling the Pulls of Practice and the Push of Research.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:27-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014746. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Exploring the effects of longstanding academic-community partnerships on study outcomes: A case study.
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Sep 12;8:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.09.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2015.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Mar 3;66(8):201-206. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6608a1.
7
Impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: Accelerating the Translation of Research Into Practice.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3 Suppl 3):S233-S240. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.026.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验