Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241259915. doi: 10.1177/21501319241259915.
Recruiting organizations (i.e., health plans, health systems, or clinical practices) is important for implementation science, yet limited research explores effective strategies for engaging organizations in pragmatic studies. We explore the effort required to meet recruitment targets for a pragmatic implementation trial, characteristics of engaged and non-engaged clinical practices, and reasons health plans and rural clinical practices chose to participate.
We explored recruitment activities and factors associated with organizational enrollment in SMARTER CRC, a randomized pragmatic trial to increase rates of CRC screening in rural populations. We sought to recruit 30 rural primary care practices within participating Medicaid health plans. We tracked recruitment outreach contacts, meeting content, and outcomes using tracking logs. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we analyzed interviews, surveys, and publicly available clinical practice data to identify facilitators of participation.
Overall recruitment activities spanned January 2020 to April 2021. Five of the 9 health plans approached agreed to participate (55%). Three of the health plans chose to operate centrally as 1 site based on network structure, resulting in 3 recruited health plan sites. Of the 101 identified practices, 76 met study eligibility criteria; 51% (n = 39) enrolled. Between recruitment and randomization, 1 practice was excluded, 5 withdrew, and 7 practices were collapsed into 3 sites for randomization purposes based on clinical practice structure, leaving 29 randomized sites. Successful recruitment required iterative outreach across time, with a range of 2 to 17 encounters per clinical practice. Facilitators to recruitment included multi-modal outreach, prior relationships, effective messaging, flexibility, and good timing.
Recruiting health plans and rural clinical practices was complex and iterative. Leveraging existing relationships and allocating time and resources to engage clinical practices in pragmatic implementation research may facilitate more diverse representation in future trials and generalizability of research findings.
对于实施科学来说,招募组织(即健康计划、卫生系统或临床实践)很重要,但有限的研究探讨了使组织参与务实研究的有效策略。我们探讨了为实现一项务实实施试验的招募目标所需要的努力、参与和未参与的临床实践的特点,以及健康计划和农村临床实践选择参与的原因。
我们探讨了招募活动以及与组织参与 SMARTER CRC 相关的因素,SMARTER CRC 是一项旨在提高农村人群 CRC 筛查率的随机务实试验。我们试图在参与医疗补助的健康计划内招募 30 个农村初级保健实践。我们使用跟踪日志来跟踪招募外展接触、会议内容和结果。根据综合实施研究框架,我们分析了访谈、调查和公开的临床实践数据,以确定参与的促进因素。
总体招募活动从 2020 年 1 月持续到 2021 年 4 月。所接触的 9 个健康计划中有 5 个(55%)同意参与。由于网络结构,其中 3 个健康计划选择集中作为 1 个站点运营,从而招募了 3 个健康计划站点。在 101 个确定的实践中,有 76 个符合研究资格标准;51%(n=39)入组。在招募和随机分组之间,有 1 个实践被排除,5 个退出,根据临床实践结构,7 个实践被合并为 3 个实践用于随机分组,剩下 29 个随机分组实践。成功的招募需要经过时间的反复外展,每个临床实践的接触次数在 2 到 17 次之间。招募的促进因素包括多模式外展、先前的关系、有效的信息传递、灵活性和良好的时机。
招募健康计划和农村临床实践是复杂和迭代的。利用现有关系并分配时间和资源来使临床实践参与务实的实施研究,可能有助于未来试验中更具多样性的代表性和研究结果的普遍性。