• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算瑞典公共医疗保健系统中每增加一年生命的边际成本。

Estimating the marginal cost of a life year in Sweden's public healthcare sector.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Technology Assessment, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jul;20(5):751-762. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01039-0. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-019-01039-0
PMID:30796552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6602994/
Abstract

Although cost-effectiveness analysis has a long tradition of supporting healthcare decision-making in Sweden, there are no clear criteria for when an intervention is considered too expensive. In particular, the opportunity cost of healthcare resource use in terms of health forgone has not been investigated empirically. In this work, we therefore seek to estimate the marginal cost of a life year in Sweden's public healthcare sector using time series and panel data at the national and regional levels, respectively. We find that estimation using time series is unfeasible due to reversed causality. However, through panel instrumental variable estimation we are able to derive a marginal cost per life year of about SEK 370,000 (EUR 39,000). Although this estimate is in line with emerging evidence from other healthcare systems, it is associated with uncertainty, primarily due to the inherent difficulties of causal inference using aggregate observational data. The implications of these difficulties and related methodological issues are discussed.

摘要

尽管成本效益分析在瑞典有着悠久的支持医疗保健决策的传统,但对于何时认为干预措施过于昂贵,尚无明确的标准。特别是,尚未从经验上研究过放弃健康所带来的医疗资源使用的机会成本。在这项工作中,我们分别使用时间序列和面板数据来估计瑞典公共医疗保健部门中每增加一年生命的边际成本。我们发现,由于反向因果关系,使用时间序列进行估计是不可行的。但是,通过面板工具变量估计,我们能够得出每增加一年生命的边际成本约为 370,000 瑞典克朗(39,000 欧元)。尽管这一估计与其他医疗保健系统的新出现的证据相符,但它存在不确定性,主要是由于使用汇总观测数据进行因果推断所固有的困难。讨论了这些困难和相关方法问题的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/8c426936bbd7/10198_2019_1039_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/3a94c815b61c/10198_2019_1039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/db10c3d0ca74/10198_2019_1039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/4691c29fa0c1/10198_2019_1039_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/8c426936bbd7/10198_2019_1039_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/3a94c815b61c/10198_2019_1039_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/db10c3d0ca74/10198_2019_1039_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/4691c29fa0c1/10198_2019_1039_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93bd/6602994/8c426936bbd7/10198_2019_1039_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the marginal cost of a life year in Sweden's public healthcare sector.估算瑞典公共医疗保健系统中每增加一年生命的边际成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jul;20(5):751-762. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01039-0. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
2
The Impact of Healthcare spending on Life Expectancy: Evidence from Selected West African Countries.医疗支出对预期寿命的影响:来自部分西非国家的证据。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2018 Dec;22(4):64-71. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2018/v22i4.7.
3
Estimating the Reference Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio for the Australian Health System.估算澳大利亚卫生系统的参考增量成本-效果比。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0585-2.
4
How Business Cycles Affect the Healthcare Sector: A Cross-country Investigation.商业周期如何影响医疗保健行业:一项跨国调查。
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):787-800. doi: 10.1002/hec.3187. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
5
Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for the Spanish NHS.估算西班牙国民医疗服务体系的成本效益阈值。
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):746-761. doi: 10.1002/hec.3633. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Estimating the Marginal Productivity of the English National Health Service From 2003 to 2012.估算 2003 至 2012 年英国国家医疗服务体系的边际生产力
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1926. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
7
Health care expenditure and health outcome nexus: new evidence from the SAARC-ASEAN region.卫生保健支出与健康结果的关系:来自南盟-东盟地区的新证据。
Global Health. 2018 Nov 22;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0430-1.
8
The impact of healthcare spending on health outcomes: A meta-regression analysis.医疗保健支出对健康结果的影响:一项元回归分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
Local health care expenditure plans and their opportunity costs.地方医疗保健支出计划及其机会成本。
Health Policy. 2015 Sep;119(9):1237-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
Estimating the Health Effects of Expansions in Health Expenditure in Indonesia: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach.估算印度尼西亚卫生支出扩张对健康的影响:动态面板数据方法。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Nov;20(6):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00752-x. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the Incremental Cost Per QALY Produced by the Spanish NHS: A Fixed-Effect Econometric Approach.估算西班牙国民健康服务体系产生的每质量调整生命年的增量成本:一种固定效应计量经济学方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Jan;43(1):109-122. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01441-4. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
A systematic review on the direct approach to elicit the demand-side cost-effectiveness threshold: Implications for low- and middle-income countries.一项关于直接 elicitation 需求方成本效益阈值的系统评价:对低收入和中等收入国家的启示。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0297450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297450. eCollection 2024.
3
Estimating the cost-effectiveness threshold of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China using mean opportunity cost and contingent valuation method.

本文引用的文献

1
When is it too expensive? Cost-effectiveness thresholds and health care decision-making.何时成本过高?成本效益阈值与医疗保健决策。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;20(2):175-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1000-4.
2
Surveying the Cost-Effectiveness of the 20 Procedures with the Largest Public Health Services Waiting Lists in Ireland: Implications for Ireland's Cost-Effectiveness Threshold.调查爱尔兰公共卫生服务等候名单中 20 项程序的成本效益:对爱尔兰成本效益阈值的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
The impact of NHS expenditure on health outcomes in England: Alternative approaches to identification in all-cause and disease specific models of mortality.
运用平均机会成本法和条件价值评估法估算中国晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效益阈值。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Nov 2;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00487-z.
4
The Broader Opportunity Costs in the Broader Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Framework.更广泛成本效益分析框架中的更广泛机会成本。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):373-384. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00801-z. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Estimating health system opportunity costs: the role of non-linearities and inefficiency.估算卫生系统的机会成本:非线性和无效率的作用。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Oct 29;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00391-y.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the new oncological drug durvalumab in Italian patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.新抗肿瘤药物 durvalumab 在意大利 III 期非小细胞肺癌患者中的成本效果分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Oct;13(19):2692-2698. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14531. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
7
Supply-Side Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Questions for Evidence-Based Policy.供给侧成本效益阈值:循证政策的问题。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Sep;20(5):651-667. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00730-3. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
8
How Responsive is Mortality to Locally Administered Healthcare Expenditure? Estimates for England for 2014/15.医疗支出的地方管理对死亡率的反应有多灵敏?2014/15 年英格兰的估计值。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):557-572. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00723-2. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
Causal impact of social care, public health and healthcare expenditure on mortality in England: cross-sectional evidence for 2013/2014.社会关怀、公共卫生和医疗保健支出对英格兰死亡率的因果影响:2013/2014 年的横断面证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):e046417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046417.
10
Accounting for country- and time-specific values in the economic evaluation of health-related projects relevant to low- and middle-income countries.在对与中低收入国家相关的健康相关项目进行经济评估时,考虑国家和时间特异性价值。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jan 13;37(1):45-54. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab104.
英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)支出对健康结果的影响:全因死亡率和特定疾病死亡率模型中识别的替代方法。
Health Econ. 2018 Jun;27(6):1017-1023. doi: 10.1002/hec.3650. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
4
Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for the Spanish NHS.估算西班牙国民医疗服务体系的成本效益阈值。
Health Econ. 2018 Apr;27(4):746-761. doi: 10.1002/hec.3633. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Estimating the Reference Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio for the Australian Health System.估算澳大利亚卫生系统的参考增量成本-效果比。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0585-2.
6
The impact of healthcare spending on health outcomes: A meta-regression analysis.医疗保健支出对健康结果的影响:一项元回归分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;179:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所成本效益阈值的估计方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(14):1-503, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta19140.
8
Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states.基于瑞典经验的EQ-5D健康状态价值集。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):431-42. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0496-4. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
9
Comparing costs and outcomes across programmes of health care.比较医疗保健计划的成本和结果。
Health Econ. 2012 Mar;21(3):316-37. doi: 10.1002/hec.1716. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
10
Does health care spending improve health outcomes? Evidence from English programme budgeting data.医疗保健支出能改善健康结果吗?来自英国项目预算数据的证据。
J Health Econ. 2008 Jul;27(4):826-842. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.12.002. Epub 2007 Dec 25.