Brunyé Tad T, Drew Trafton, Weaver Donald L, Elmore Joann G
Center for Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Tufts University, 200 Boston Ave., Suite 3000, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Feb 22;4(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0159-2.
Inspecting digital imaging for primary diagnosis introduces perceptual and cognitive demands for physicians tasked with interpreting visual medical information and arriving at appropriate diagnoses and treatment decisions. The process of medical interpretation and diagnosis involves a complex interplay between visual perception and multiple cognitive processes, including memory retrieval, problem-solving, and decision-making. Eye-tracking technologies are becoming increasingly available in the consumer and research markets and provide novel opportunities to learn more about the interpretive process, including differences between novices and experts, how heuristics and biases shape visual perception and decision-making, and the mechanisms underlying misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. The present review provides an overview of eye-tracking technology, the perceptual and cognitive processes involved in medical interpretation, how eye tracking has been employed to understand medical interpretation and promote medical education and training, and some of the promises and challenges for future applications of this technology.
检查数字成像以进行初步诊断,对负责解读视觉医学信息并做出适当诊断和治疗决策的医生提出了感知和认知方面的要求。医学解读和诊断过程涉及视觉感知与多种认知过程之间的复杂相互作用,包括记忆检索、问题解决和决策。眼动追踪技术在消费市场和研究市场中越来越普及,为深入了解解读过程提供了新机会,包括新手与专家之间的差异、启发式方法和偏差如何影响视觉感知和决策,以及错误解读和误诊背后的机制。本综述概述了眼动追踪技术、医学解读中涉及的感知和认知过程、眼动追踪如何被用于理解医学解读并促进医学教育与培训,以及该技术未来应用的一些前景和挑战。