Oxford University, School of Anthropology & Museum Ethnography, 51/53 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6PE, United Kingdom.
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Apr;90:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Research about online child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) users focuses on psychological assessments, demographics, motivations, and offending rates. Little is known about their understandings of children in CSEM.
From an anthropological perspective, examine CSEM users' constructions of children and childhood online and offline, and explore how these factor into their crimes.
CSEM users in UK group programs.
In-depth ethnography, including 17 months of participant observation in group programs with 81 CSEM users, 31 semi-structured interviews with group participants, and inductive analysis of themes illuminated by childhood theory from anthropology.
When referring to children offline, many participants claimed to align with Euro-American norms and constructions surrounding children's learning, protection, irrationality, inexperience, asexuality, and innocence. However online, many constructed children differently: as less or not "real," and as sexualized. This rendered children in CSEM fundamentally different, which facilitated offending, assisted in overcoming barriers, and allowed participants to hold conventional beliefs about children and childhood while engaging in incongruent online activity. Vital in this process was Internet use and associated distancing, detachment, anonymity, and cultural othering. The program used victim empathy to restore dominant norms to online children, for which participants invoked feelings, recognized their role in abuse, extrapolated consequences for victims, and reinforced norms.
Constructions of children and childhood were central in offending. The complexities of negotiating "real" versus "not real" in both offending and victim empathy are discussed, as are conceptual distinctions between "constructions" and "cognitive distortions," and implications for treatment and prevention.
关于在线儿童性剥削材料(CSEM)使用者的研究主要集中在心理评估、人口统计学、动机和犯罪率上。关于他们对 CSEM 中儿童的理解知之甚少。
从人类学的角度,考察 CSEM 用户在线上和线下对儿童和童年的建构,并探讨这些因素如何影响他们的犯罪行为。
英国团体项目中的 CSEM 用户。
深入的民族志研究,包括在 81 名 CSEM 用户的团体项目中进行了 17 个月的参与式观察、对 31 名团体参与者的半结构化访谈,以及对人类学中儿童理论启发的主题进行归纳分析。
当提到线下的儿童时,许多参与者声称与欧洲-美国的规范和围绕儿童学习、保护、非理性、缺乏经验、无性和纯真的建构相一致。然而,在线上,许多人对儿童的建构则不同:认为儿童不太真实或不真实,并且性化。这使得 CSEM 中的儿童在根本上有所不同,这便于犯罪,帮助克服障碍,并允许参与者在从事不一致的在线活动的同时持有对儿童和童年的传统信念。在这个过程中,互联网的使用以及与之相关的距离感、超脱感、匿名性和文化异化是至关重要的。该项目利用受害者同理心将主流规范恢复到在线儿童身上,参与者借此表达情感,认识到自己在虐待中的角色,推断对受害者的后果,并强化规范。
对儿童和童年的建构是犯罪的核心。讨论了在犯罪和受害者同理心方面,“真实”与“不真实”的复杂关系,以及“建构”和“认知扭曲”之间的概念区别,以及对治疗和预防的影响。