Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;132:417-450. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
Distinct classes of neurons arise at different positions along the dorsal-ventral axis of the spinal cord leading to spinal neurons being segregated along this axis according to their physiological properties and functions. Thus, the neurons associated with motor control are generally located in, or adjacent to, the ventral horn whereas the interneurons (INs) that mediate sensory activities are present within the dorsal horn. Here, we review classic and recent studies examining the developmental mechanisms that establish the dorsal-ventral axis in the embryonic spinal cord. Intriguingly, while the cellular organization of the dorsal and ventral halves of the spinal cord looks superficially similar during early development, the underlying molecular mechanisms that establish dorsal vs ventral patterning are markedly distinct. For example, the ventral spinal cord is patterned by the actions of a single growth factor, sonic hedgehog (Shh) acting as a morphogen, i.e., concentration-dependent signal. Recent studies have shed light on the mechanisms by which the spatial and temporal gradient of Shh is transduced by cells to elicit the generation of different classes of ventral INs, and motor neurons (MNs). In contrast, the dorsal spinal cord is patterned by the action of multiple factors, most notably by members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wnt families. While less is known about dorsal patterning, recent studies have suggested that the BMPs do not act as morphogens to specify dorsal IN identities as previously proposed, rather each BMP has signal-specific activities. Finally, we consider the promise that elucidation of these mechanisms holds for neural repair.
不同类别的神经元沿着脊髓的背-腹轴在不同的位置产生,导致脊髓神经元根据其生理特性和功能沿着这个轴被分隔。因此,与运动控制相关的神经元通常位于腹角中或其附近,而介导感觉活动的中间神经元(INs)则存在于背角中。在这里,我们回顾了经典和最近的研究,这些研究检查了在胚胎脊髓中建立背-腹轴的发育机制。有趣的是,虽然脊髓背侧和腹侧两半在早期发育中看起来表面上相似,但建立背侧与腹侧模式的潜在分子机制却明显不同。例如,脊髓腹侧是由单个生长因子—— sonic hedgehog(Shh)——作为形态发生因子(即浓度依赖性信号)的作用来模式化的。最近的研究揭示了 Shh 的空间和时间梯度如何被细胞转导,从而引发不同类别的腹侧 INs 和运动神经元(MNs)的产生的机制。相比之下,脊髓背侧是由多种因素的作用来模式化的,最显著的是骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)和 Wnt 家族的成员。虽然对背侧模式化的了解较少,但最近的研究表明,BMPs 不像以前提出的那样作为形态发生因子来指定背侧 IN 身份,而是每个 BMP 都具有信号特异性活性。最后,我们考虑了阐明这些机制对神经修复的意义。