Suppr超能文献

携带有 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 与 ATM 突变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌男性患者对奥拉帕利治疗的差异化反应。

Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations.

机构信息

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Division of Medical Oncology, University of WashingtonUSA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2019 Oct;76(4):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, are being explored as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men harboring mutations in homologous recombination DNA-repair genes. Whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ according to the affected gene is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ between men with BRCA1/2 and those with ATM mutations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 23 consecutive men with mCRPC and pathogenic germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations treated with olaparib at three academic sites in the USA.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA response) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The study included two men with BRCA1 mutations, 15 with BRCA2 mutations, and six with ATM mutations. PSA responses to olaparib were achieved in 76% (13/17) of men with BRCA1/2 versus 0% (0/6) of men with ATM mutations (Fisher's exact test; p=0.002). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median PFS of 12.3mo versus 2.4mo for those with ATM mutations (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.57; p=0.004). Limitations include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with mCRPC harboring ATM mutations experienced inferior outcomes to PARP inhibitor therapy compared to those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Alternative therapies should be explored for patients with ATM mutations.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM genes are common in metastatic prostate cancer. In this study we compared outcomes for men with BRCA1/2 mutations to those for men with ATM mutations being treated with olaparib. We found that men with ATM mutations do not respond as well as men with BRCA1/2 mutations.

摘要

背景

聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,如奥拉帕利,正在被探索作为携带同源重组 DNA 修复基因突变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性的治疗选择。PARP 抑制剂的反应是否因受影响的基因而异目前尚不清楚。

目的

确定 PARP 抑制剂在携带 BRCA1/2 和 ATM 突变的男性中的反应是否存在差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国三个学术中心进行的多中心回顾性研究,共纳入 23 例接受奥拉帕利治疗的 mCRPC 且携带致病性种系和/或体细胞 BRCA1/2 或 ATM 突变的连续男性患者。

结局测量和统计分析

使用 Fisher 精确检验比较前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)下降≥50%的患者比例。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计临床和放射学无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期,并使用对数秩检验比较。

结果和局限性

该研究纳入了 2 例 BRCA1 突变患者、15 例 BRCA2 突变患者和 6 例 ATM 突变患者。BRCA1/2 突变患者中奥拉帕利的 PSA 反应率为 76%(13/17),而 ATM 突变患者为 0%(0/6)(Fisher 精确检验;p=0.002)。携带 BRCA1/2 突变的患者中位 PFS 为 12.3 个月,而携带 ATM 突变的患者为 2.4 个月(风险比 0.17,95%置信区间 0.05-0.57;p=0.004)。局限性包括回顾性设计和相对较小的样本量。

结论

与携带 BRCA1/2 突变的患者相比,携带 ATM 突变的 mCRPC 患者接受 PARP 抑制剂治疗的结局较差。对于携带 ATM 突变的患者,应探索替代疗法。

患者总结

BRCA1/2 和 ATM 基因突变在转移性前列腺癌中很常见。在这项研究中,我们比较了携带 BRCA1/2 突变的男性与携带 ATM 突变的男性接受奥拉帕利治疗的结果。我们发现,携带 ATM 突变的男性对奥拉帕利的反应不如携带 BRCA1/2 突变的男性好。

相似文献

2
Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.奥拉帕利治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2091-2102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911440. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The long tail of oncogenic drivers in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中致癌驱动基因的长尾现象。
Nat Genet. 2018 May;50(5):645-651. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0078-z. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验