Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of Medical Oncology, University of WashingtonUSA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center Seattle, Washington, USA.
Eur Urol. 2019 Oct;76(4):452-458. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, are being explored as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men harboring mutations in homologous recombination DNA-repair genes. Whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ according to the affected gene is currently unknown.
To determine whether responses to PARP inhibitors differ between men with BRCA1/2 and those with ATM mutations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 23 consecutive men with mCRPC and pathogenic germline and/or somatic BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations treated with olaparib at three academic sites in the USA.
The proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA response) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Clinical and radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and compared using the log-rank test.
The study included two men with BRCA1 mutations, 15 with BRCA2 mutations, and six with ATM mutations. PSA responses to olaparib were achieved in 76% (13/17) of men with BRCA1/2 versus 0% (0/6) of men with ATM mutations (Fisher's exact test; p=0.002). Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations had median PFS of 12.3mo versus 2.4mo for those with ATM mutations (hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.57; p=0.004). Limitations include the retrospective design and relatively small sample size.
Men with mCRPC harboring ATM mutations experienced inferior outcomes to PARP inhibitor therapy compared to those harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Alternative therapies should be explored for patients with ATM mutations.
Mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM genes are common in metastatic prostate cancer. In this study we compared outcomes for men with BRCA1/2 mutations to those for men with ATM mutations being treated with olaparib. We found that men with ATM mutations do not respond as well as men with BRCA1/2 mutations.
聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂,如奥拉帕利,正在被探索作为携带同源重组 DNA 修复基因突变的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性的治疗选择。PARP 抑制剂的反应是否因受影响的基因而异目前尚不清楚。
确定 PARP 抑制剂在携带 BRCA1/2 和 ATM 突变的男性中的反应是否存在差异。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国三个学术中心进行的多中心回顾性研究,共纳入 23 例接受奥拉帕利治疗的 mCRPC 且携带致病性种系和/或体细胞 BRCA1/2 或 ATM 突变的连续男性患者。
使用 Fisher 精确检验比较前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)下降≥50%的患者比例。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计临床和放射学无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期,并使用对数秩检验比较。
该研究纳入了 2 例 BRCA1 突变患者、15 例 BRCA2 突变患者和 6 例 ATM 突变患者。BRCA1/2 突变患者中奥拉帕利的 PSA 反应率为 76%(13/17),而 ATM 突变患者为 0%(0/6)(Fisher 精确检验;p=0.002)。携带 BRCA1/2 突变的患者中位 PFS 为 12.3 个月,而携带 ATM 突变的患者为 2.4 个月(风险比 0.17,95%置信区间 0.05-0.57;p=0.004)。局限性包括回顾性设计和相对较小的样本量。
与携带 BRCA1/2 突变的患者相比,携带 ATM 突变的 mCRPC 患者接受 PARP 抑制剂治疗的结局较差。对于携带 ATM 突变的患者,应探索替代疗法。
BRCA1/2 和 ATM 基因突变在转移性前列腺癌中很常见。在这项研究中,我们比较了携带 BRCA1/2 突变的男性与携带 ATM 突变的男性接受奥拉帕利治疗的结果。我们发现,携带 ATM 突变的男性对奥拉帕利的反应不如携带 BRCA1/2 突变的男性好。