Suppr超能文献

根据欧盟烟草制品指令(2014/40/EU)的要求对优先烟草添加剂进行评估:第 1 部分:背景、方法和研究结果总结。

Assessment of priority tobacco additives per the requirements of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU): Part 1: Background, approach, and summary of findings.

机构信息

Imperial Tobacco, 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, United Kingdom.

Imperial Tobacco, 121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol, BS3 2LL, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;104:84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Abstract

This paper is part of a series of 3 publications and describes the non-clinical and clinical assessment performed to fulfill the regulatory requirement per Art. 6 (2) of the EU Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU; under which Member States shall require manufacturers and importers of cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco containing an additive that is included in the priority list established by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/787 to carry out comprehensive studies. The Directive requires manufacturers and importers of cigarettes and Roll Your Own tobacco to examine for each additive whether it; contributes to and increases the toxicity or addictiveness of tobacco products to a significant or measurable degree; if it leads to a characterizing flavor of the product; if it facilitates inhalation or nicotine uptake, and if it results in the formation of CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic) constituents and if these substances increase the CMR properties of the respective tobacco product to a significant or measurable degree. This publication gives an overview on comprehensive smoke chemistry, in vitro toxicity, and human clinical studies commissioned by the members of the Priority Additives Tobacco Consortium to independent Contract Research Organizations (CROs) where the emissions of test cigarettes containing priority additives were compared to emissions emerging from an additive-free reference cigarette. Whilst minor changes in smoke chemistry parameters were observed when comparing emissions from test cigarettes with emissions from additive-free reference cigarettes, only two of the additives (sorbitol and guar gum) tested led to significant increases in a limited number of smoke constituents. These changes were not observed when sorbitol or guar gum were tested in a mixture with other priority additives. None of the priority additives resulted in increases in in vitro toxicity (Ames, Micronucleus, Neutral Red Uptake) or led to changes in smoking behavior or absorption (rate or amount) of nicotine measured during the human clinical study as compared to the additive-free reference cigarette.

摘要

本文是三篇论文之一,描述了非临床和临床评估,以满足欧盟烟草制品指令 2014/40/EU 第 6(2)条的监管要求;根据该指令,成员国应要求卷烟和含有添加剂的自卷烟草的制造商和进口商进行全面研究,这些添加剂包含在委员会实施决定 (EU) 2016/787 确定的优先清单中。该指令要求卷烟和自卷烟草的制造商和进口商对每种添加剂进行检查,以确定其是否:显著或可测量地增加烟草制品的毒性或成瘾性;导致产品具有特征性的风味;促进吸入或尼古丁吸收;导致形成 CMR(致癌、致突变和生殖毒性)成分;以及这些物质是否显著或可测量地增加相应烟草制品的 CMR 特性。本文概述了由优先添加剂烟草联盟成员委托给独立合同研究组织 (CRO) 的全面烟雾化学、体外毒性和人体临床研究,其中比较了含有优先添加剂的测试卷烟的排放与无添加剂参考卷烟的排放。虽然在比较测试卷烟和无添加剂参考卷烟的排放时观察到烟雾化学参数的微小变化,但只有两种添加剂(山梨糖醇和瓜尔胶)在有限数量的烟雾成分中导致显著增加。当山梨糖醇或瓜尔胶与其他优先添加剂混合测试时,未观察到这些变化。在体外毒性(Ames、微核、中性红摄取)或吸烟行为或尼古丁吸收(速度或量)方面,没有一种优先添加剂与无添加剂参考卷烟相比发生变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验