Suppr超能文献

关于向制造商索取综合研究的类型和标准的建议:健康、环境和新出现风险科学委员会(SCHEER)的意见。

Advice to the European Commission as Regards Type and Criteria for Comprehensive Studies to Be Requested From Manufacturers: The Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental, and Emerging Risks (SCHEER).

机构信息

SCHEER Secretariat, European Commission, DG Health and Food Safety, Directorate C: Public Health, Country Knowledge, Crisis Management, Unit C2: Country Knowledge and Scientific Committees, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):613-618. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz006.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The European Commission has established a priority list of 15 additives contained in cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco subject to enhanced reporting obligations. The European Union (EU) Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) prescribes that Member States shall require manufacturers and importers of tobacco products to carry out comprehensive studies on these additives to assess their contribution to any of the properties listed in Article 6 of the TPD: toxicity or addictiveness, characterizing flavor, inhalation facilitation, nicotine uptake, and carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction. The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental, and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) has provided guidance on the type and criteria for comprehensive studies, and on the most suitable methodologies to test these 15 tobacco additives as well as additives on future updated lists. The SCHEER proposes a stepwise strategy as the most pragmatic and efficient way to assess the effects of tobacco additives. In addition to proposing specific steps and tests to be considered by industry, some general criteria were also identified such as no comparative testing (testing cigarettes with and without the additive) and no animal studies. As tobacco additives have no benefits for health, but rather may promote use of and addiction to an extremely toxic product, a risk-benefit analysis is not the appropriate paradigm for assessing the additive. When comprehensive studies confirm that additives have any of the properties listed in Article 6 of the TPD, regulatory actions should be considered. If uncertainties cannot be solved by comprehensive studies, the SCHEER recommends that the assessors consider the worst-case evaluation.

IMPLICATIONS

In this article, the SCHEER proposes a stepwise strategy to assess (1) the toxic and addictive effects, (2) the characterizing flavor, and (3) facilitating inhalation properties of tobacco additives. The proposed steps and tests provide guidance to (1) Member State on which comprehensive studies should be requested and (2) tobacco industry on which strategy of testing should be applied to address the request and to prepare reports to be sent to the relevant authorities for the evaluation of tobacco additives "safety" to comply with the Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU.

摘要

未加标签

欧盟委员会已确定了 15 种香烟和自卷烟草添加剂的优先清单,这些添加剂需履行强化报告义务。欧盟(EU)烟草制品指令(TPD)规定,成员国应要求烟草制品制造商和进口商对这些添加剂进行全面研究,以评估它们对 TPD 第 6 条列出的任何特性的贡献:毒性或成瘾性、特征风味、吸入促进、尼古丁摄取以及致癌、致突变或对生殖有毒。健康、环境和新兴风险科学委员会(SCHEER)提供了关于全面研究的类型和标准的指导,以及测试这 15 种烟草添加剂以及未来更新清单中的添加剂的最合适方法。SCHEER 提出了分阶段策略,这是评估烟草添加剂影响的最务实和有效的方法。除了提出行业应考虑的具体步骤和测试外,还确定了一些一般标准,例如不进行比较测试(测试有添加剂和无添加剂的香烟)和不进行动物研究。由于烟草添加剂对健康没有益处,反而可能促进对极毒产品的使用和成瘾,因此风险效益分析并不是评估添加剂的适当模式。当全面研究证实添加剂具有 TPD 第 6 条列出的任何特性时,应考虑采取监管行动。如果全面研究无法解决不确定性,SCHEER 建议评估人员考虑最坏情况评估。

意义

本文中,SCHEER 提出了分阶段策略来评估(1)烟草添加剂的毒性和成瘾性、(2)特征风味和(3)吸入促进特性。提出的步骤和测试为(1)成员国提供了指导,即应要求进行哪些全面研究,以及(2)烟草业提供了指导,即应采用哪种测试策略来应对请求,并为向相关当局提交报告,以评估烟草添加剂的“安全性”,以遵守 2014/40/EU 号指令。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验