Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, 776, 1st Sunhwan-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do, 28646, South Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, 20 Ilsan-ro, Wonju, Gangwon-do, 26426, South Korea.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1437-1449. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01095-4. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
This study aimed to measure the preventive effect of seat belt on traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to compare the effect according to the crash severities and collision directions.
Korea In-Depth Accident Study (KIDAS) has collected vehicle and demographic data on injured occupants involved in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) who visited three emergency medical centers for calendar years 2011-2016. Primary and secondary end points were TBI (abbreviated injury score 2+) and in-hospital mortality. Crush extent (CE) was classified into 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, and 7-9 according to the crash severity. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of seat belts and CE for study outcomes and developed an interaction model in each collision direction using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Of the 2,245 occupants who were injured in MVCs, 295 (13.1%) occupants sustained TBI. In univariate analysis, old age, unbelted status, lateral collision, and higher CE were factors associated with TBI in MVCs. Occupants with belted status was less likely to have TBI and in-hospital mortality compared with those with unbelted status [AORs (95% CI) 0.48 (0.37-0.62) and 0.49 (0.30-0.81), respectively]. In interaction analysis, preventive effects of seat belts on TBI from MVCs were retained within CE 5-6 in frontal MVCs and within CE 1-2 in near side lateral MVCs, and those of seat belts on in-hospital mortality were reserved within CE 3-4 in frontal and rollover MVCs.
The preventive effects of seat belts on TBI and in-hospital mortality are preserved within a limited crash severity in each collision direction.
本研究旨在衡量安全带对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的预防作用,并比较根据碰撞严重程度和碰撞方向的效果。
韩国深入事故研究(KIDAS)收集了 2011-2016 年在三个急诊医疗中心就诊的涉及机动车碰撞(MVC)的受伤乘客的车辆和人口统计学数据。主要和次要终点是 TBI(损伤严重程度评分 2+)和住院死亡率。根据碰撞严重程度,挤压程度(CE)分为 1-2、3-4、5-6 和 7-9。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析计算了安全带和 CE 对研究结果的校正比值比(OR),并在每个碰撞方向开发了交互模型。
在 2245 名因 MVC 受伤的乘客中,295 名(13.1%)乘客发生 TBI。在单因素分析中,年龄较大、未系安全带、侧面碰撞和更高的 CE 是 MVC 中 TBI 的相关因素。与未系安全带的乘客相比,系安全带的乘客发生 TBI 和住院死亡率的可能性较小[校正比值比(95%CI)分别为 0.48(0.37-0.62)和 0.49(0.30-0.81)]。在交互分析中,安全带对正面 MVC 中 CE5-6 内和侧面近侧 MVC 中 CE1-2 内的 TBI 的预防作用得到保留,安全带对正面和翻车 MVC 中 CE3-4 内的住院死亡率的预防作用得到保留。
安全带对 TBI 和住院死亡率的预防作用在每个碰撞方向的有限碰撞严重程度内得到保留。