Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗前根治性膀胱切除术患者报告结局的倾向评分匹配分析。

Propensity-matched analysis of patient-reported outcomes for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery-Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 170 E. 77th St, New York, NY, 10075, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2401-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02692-z. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for bladder cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) using longitudinal data and propensity-matched scoring analyses.

METHODS

155 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer scheduled for RC completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BLM30, Fear of Recurrence Scale, Mental Health Inventory and Satisfaction with Life Scale within 4 weeks of surgery. A propensity-matched analysis was performed comparing pre-surgery PROs among 101 patients who completed NAC versus 54 patients who did not receive NAC. We also compared PROs pre- and post-chemotherapy for 16 patients who had data available for both time points.

RESULTS

In propensity-matched analysis, NAC-treated patients reported better emotional and sexual function, mental health, urinary function and fewer financial concerns compared to those that did not receive NAC. Longitudinal analysis showed increases in fatigue, nausea and appetite loss following chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Propensity-matched analysis did not demonstrate a negative effect of NAC on PRO. Several positive associations of NAC were found in the propensity-matched analysis, possibly due to other confounding differences between the two groups or actual clinical benefit. Longitudinal analysis of a small number of patients found small to modest detrimental effects from NAC similar to toxicities previously reported. Our preliminary findings, along with known survival and toxicity data, should be considered in decision-making for NAC.

摘要

目的

使用纵向数据和倾向评分匹配评分分析,评估接受新辅助化疗(NAC)后行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的膀胱癌患者的患者报告结局(PRO)。

方法

155 例肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者在 RC 术前 4 周内完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷 EORTC QLQ-C30、EORTC QLQ-BLM30、复发恐惧量表、心理健康量表和生活满意度量表。对 101 例接受 NAC 治疗的患者和 54 例未接受 NAC 治疗的患者进行术前 PRO 倾向评分匹配分析。我们还比较了 16 例有化疗前后数据的患者的 PRO,分析了这两个时间点的 PRO。

结果

在倾向评分匹配分析中,与未接受 NAC 治疗的患者相比,接受 NAC 治疗的患者报告情绪和性功能、心理健康、尿功能更好,经济担忧更少。纵向分析显示,化疗后疲劳、恶心和食欲减退增加。

结论

倾向评分匹配分析未显示 NAC 对 PRO 有负面影响。在倾向评分匹配分析中发现了 NAC 的几个正相关,这可能是由于两组之间的其他混杂差异或实际的临床获益。对少数患者进行的纵向分析发现,NAC 产生了类似于先前报道的毒性的轻微到中度的不利影响。我们的初步发现,以及已知的生存和毒性数据,应在 NAC 的决策中考虑。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting.药物安全报告中患者缺失的声音。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):865-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911494.
7
The Satisfaction With Life Scale.生活满意度量表。
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
9
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.浸润性膀胱癌的新辅助化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2004(2):CD005246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005246.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验