Department of Surgery-Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 170 E. 77th St, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2401-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02692-z. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for bladder cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) using longitudinal data and propensity-matched scoring analyses.
155 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer scheduled for RC completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BLM30, Fear of Recurrence Scale, Mental Health Inventory and Satisfaction with Life Scale within 4 weeks of surgery. A propensity-matched analysis was performed comparing pre-surgery PROs among 101 patients who completed NAC versus 54 patients who did not receive NAC. We also compared PROs pre- and post-chemotherapy for 16 patients who had data available for both time points.
In propensity-matched analysis, NAC-treated patients reported better emotional and sexual function, mental health, urinary function and fewer financial concerns compared to those that did not receive NAC. Longitudinal analysis showed increases in fatigue, nausea and appetite loss following chemotherapy.
Propensity-matched analysis did not demonstrate a negative effect of NAC on PRO. Several positive associations of NAC were found in the propensity-matched analysis, possibly due to other confounding differences between the two groups or actual clinical benefit. Longitudinal analysis of a small number of patients found small to modest detrimental effects from NAC similar to toxicities previously reported. Our preliminary findings, along with known survival and toxicity data, should be considered in decision-making for NAC.
使用纵向数据和倾向评分匹配评分分析,评估接受新辅助化疗(NAC)后行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的膀胱癌患者的患者报告结局(PRO)。
155 例肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者在 RC 术前 4 周内完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织问卷 EORTC QLQ-C30、EORTC QLQ-BLM30、复发恐惧量表、心理健康量表和生活满意度量表。对 101 例接受 NAC 治疗的患者和 54 例未接受 NAC 治疗的患者进行术前 PRO 倾向评分匹配分析。我们还比较了 16 例有化疗前后数据的患者的 PRO,分析了这两个时间点的 PRO。
在倾向评分匹配分析中,与未接受 NAC 治疗的患者相比,接受 NAC 治疗的患者报告情绪和性功能、心理健康、尿功能更好,经济担忧更少。纵向分析显示,化疗后疲劳、恶心和食欲减退增加。
倾向评分匹配分析未显示 NAC 对 PRO 有负面影响。在倾向评分匹配分析中发现了 NAC 的几个正相关,这可能是由于两组之间的其他混杂差异或实际的临床获益。对少数患者进行的纵向分析发现,NAC 产生了类似于先前报道的毒性的轻微到中度的不利影响。我们的初步发现,以及已知的生存和毒性数据,应在 NAC 的决策中考虑。