• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mechanistic link between DNA damage sensing, repairing and signaling factors and immune signaling.DNA 损伤感应、修复和信号因子与免疫信号之间的机制联系。
Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019;115:297-324. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
The DNA damage response and immune signaling alliance: Is it good or bad? Nature decides when and where.DNA 损伤反应和免疫信号联盟:这是好是坏?自然决定何时何地。
Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Oct;154:36-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
Nucleic Acid Immunity and DNA Damage Response: New Friends and Old Foes.核酸免疫与 DNA 损伤应答:新友与旧敌。
Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 26;12:660560. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.660560. eCollection 2021.
4
The crosstalk between DNA-damage responses and innate immunity.DNA 损伤反应与固有免疫的串扰。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Oct 25;140:112768. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112768. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Noncoding RNAs in DNA Damage Response: Opportunities for Cancer Therapeutics.DNA损伤反应中的非编码RNA:癌症治疗的机遇
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1699:3-21. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7435-1_1.
6
Function and Molecular Mechanism of the DNA Damage Response in Immunity and Cancer Immunotherapy.DNA 损伤反应在免疫和癌症免疫治疗中的功能和分子机制。
Front Immunol. 2021 Dec 14;12:797880. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.797880. eCollection 2021.
7
DNA Damage Response Signals Transduce Stress From Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Factors Into T Cell Dysfunction.DNA 损伤反应信号将类风湿关节炎风险因素产生的应激传递至 T 细胞功能障碍。
Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;9:3055. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03055. eCollection 2018.
8
Mechanisms of Immune Sensing of DNA Damage.DNA 损伤的免疫感应机制。
J Mol Biol. 2024 Feb 15;436(4):168424. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168424. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
9
Defining ATM-Independent Functions of the Mre11 Complex with a Novel Mouse Model.利用新型小鼠模型定义Mre11复合物的非ATM依赖性功能。
Mol Cancer Res. 2016 Feb;14(2):185-95. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0281. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Patient-Level DNA Damage Repair Pathway Profiles and Anti-Tumor Immunity for Gastric Cancer.胃癌患者的 DNA 损伤修复途径特征与抗肿瘤免疫
Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 10;12:806324. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.806324. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological and clinical implications of a model of surveillance immunity.监测免疫模型的生物学和临床意义
J Clin Invest. 2025 Aug 1;135(15). doi: 10.1172/JCI191645.
2
Insights into Noncanonical and Diversified Functions of ABCF1: From Health to Disease.ABCF1的非规范和多样化功能洞察:从健康到疾病
J Mol Biol. 2025 Jun 11;437(17):169286. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169286.
3
Telomere attrition alters extracellular vesicles conferring adverse impacts on neuronal viability and inflammatory response.端粒损耗会改变细胞外囊泡,对神经元活力和炎症反应产生不利影响。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112661. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112661. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
4
Targeting DNA Damage Repair to Enhance Antitumor Immunity in Radiotherapy: Mechanisms and Opportunities.靶向DNA损伤修复以增强放射治疗中的抗肿瘤免疫:机制与机遇
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 16;26(8):3743. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083743.
5
To cleave or not and how? The DNA exonucleases and endonucleases in immunity.切割与否以及如何切割?免疫中的DNA外切核酸酶和内切核酸酶。
Genes Dis. 2024 Jan 24;12(2):101219. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2024.101219. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Efficacy of PARP inhibitors in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer according to BRCA domain mutations and mutation type.根据BRCA结构域突变和突变类型,PARP抑制剂在晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌中的疗效
Front Oncol. 2024 Sep 9;14:1412807. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1412807. eCollection 2024.
7
Radiation therapy in mycosis fungoides.蕈样肉芽肿的放射治疗。
Dermatol Reports. 2024 May 7;16(Suppl 2):9885. doi: 10.4081/dr.2024.9885.
8
Immune Cell Contribution to Mammary Gland Development.免疫细胞对乳腺发育的贡献。
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2024 Aug 23;29(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10911-024-09568-y.
9
Chaperone- and PTM-mediated activation of IRF1 tames radiation-induced cell death and the inflammatory response.伴侣蛋白和翻译后修饰介导的 IRF1 激活可抑制辐射诱导的细胞死亡和炎症反应。
Cell Mol Immunol. 2024 Aug;21(8):856-872. doi: 10.1038/s41423-024-01185-3. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
10
GPR162 activates STING dependent DNA damage pathway as a novel tumor suppressor and radiation sensitizer.GPR162 作为一种新型的肿瘤抑制因子和辐射增敏剂,激活 STING 依赖性 DNA 损伤途径。
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023 Feb 1;8(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01224-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The cGAS-cGAMP-STING pathway connects DNA damage to inflammation, senescence, and cancer.cGAS-cGAMP-STING 通路将 DNA 损伤与炎症、衰老和癌症联系起来。
J Exp Med. 2018 May 7;215(5):1287-1299. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180139. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
2
Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response.染色体不稳定性通过细胞质 DNA 反应驱动转移。
Nature. 2018 Jan 25;553(7689):467-472. doi: 10.1038/nature25432. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
3
Absence of RNase H2 triggers generation of immunogenic micronuclei removed by autophagy.核糖核酸酶H2的缺失引发了通过自噬清除的免疫原性微核的产生。
Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Oct 15;26(20):3960-3972. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx283.
4
Cytoplasmic chromatin triggers inflammation in senescence and cancer.细胞质染色质在衰老和癌症中引发炎症。
Nature. 2017 Oct 19;550(7676):402-406. doi: 10.1038/nature24050. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei.DNA损伤后的有丝分裂进程能够实现微核内的模式识别。
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):466-470. doi: 10.1038/nature23470. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
6
Innate immune sensing of cytosolic chromatin fragments through cGAS promotes senescence.通过环鸟苷酸-腺苷酸合成酶(cGAS)对胞质染色质片段的天然免疫感应会促进细胞衰老。
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Sep;19(9):1061-1070. doi: 10.1038/ncb3586. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
7
cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity.cGAS对微核的监测将基因组不稳定性与先天免疫联系起来。
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):461-465. doi: 10.1038/nature23449. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
8
cGAS is essential for cellular senescence.cGAS 对于细胞衰老至关重要。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):E4612-E4620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705499114. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
RAD51 interconnects between DNA replication, DNA repair and immunity.RAD51在DNA复制、DNA修复和免疫之间建立联系。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 May 5;45(8):4590-4605. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx126.
10
Activation of STING-Dependent Innate Immune Signaling By S-Phase-Specific DNA Damage in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌中S期特异性DNA损伤对STING依赖性先天免疫信号的激活
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 5;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw199. Print 2017 Jan.

DNA 损伤感应、修复和信号因子与免疫信号之间的机制联系。

Mechanistic link between DNA damage sensing, repairing and signaling factors and immune signaling.

机构信息

Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.

出版信息

Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol. 2019;115:297-324. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.11.004. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2018.11.004
PMID:30798935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7043287/
Abstract

Previously, DNA damage sensing, repairing and signaling machineries were thought to mainly suppress genomic instability in response to genotoxic stress. Emerging evidence indicates a crosstalk between DNA repair machinery and the immune system. In this chapter, we attempt to decipher the molecular choreography of how factors, including ATM, BRCA1, DNA-PK, FANCA/D2, MRE11, MUS81, NBS1, RAD51 and TREX1, of multiple DNA metabolic processes are directly or indirectly involved in suppressing cytosolic DNA sensing pathway-mediated immune signaling. We provide systematic details showing how different DDR factors' roles in modulating immune signaling are not direct, but are rather a consequence of their inherent ability to sense, repair and signal in response to DNA damage. Unexpectedly, most DDR factors negatively impact the immune system; that is, the immune system shows defective signaling if there are defects in DNA repair pathways. Thus, in addition to their known DNA repair and replication functions, DDR factors help prevent erroneous activation of immune signaling. A more precise understanding of the mechanisms by which different DDR factors function in immune signaling can be exploited to redirect the immune system for both preventing and treating autoimmunity, cellular senescence and cancer in humans.

摘要

先前,人们认为 DNA 损伤感应、修复和信号机制主要用于应对遗传毒性应激,抑制基因组不稳定性。新出现的证据表明,DNA 修复机制与免疫系统之间存在串扰。在本章中,我们试图破译多种 DNA 代谢过程中的因素(包括 ATM、BRCA1、DNA-PK、FANCA/D2、MRE11、MUS81、NBS1、RAD51 和 TREX1)如何直接或间接地参与抑制细胞质 DNA 感应途径介导的免疫信号转导的分子编排。我们提供了系统的细节,展示了不同 DDR 因子在调节免疫信号中的作用不是直接的,而是它们固有地感应、修复和响应 DNA 损伤的能力的结果。出乎意料的是,大多数 DDR 因子对免疫系统有负面影响;也就是说,如果 DNA 修复途径存在缺陷,免疫系统的信号转导就会出现缺陷。因此,除了它们已知的 DNA 修复和复制功能外,DDR 因子还有助于防止免疫信号的错误激活。更精确地了解不同 DDR 因子在免疫信号转导中发挥作用的机制,可以被用来重新引导免疫系统,以预防和治疗人类的自身免疫、细胞衰老和癌症。