• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为了让试验参与者在知情同意的情况下了解安慰剂效应,他们需要知道什么:一项针对腰痛患者现有知识的调查。

What trial participants need to be told about placebo effects to give informed consent: a survey to establish existing knowledge among patients with back pain.

机构信息

Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine, London, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):867-870. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103964. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103964
PMID:28663259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5827710/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients require an accurate knowledge about placebos and their possible effects to ensure consent for placebo-controlled clinical trials is adequately informed. However, few previous studies have explored patients' baseline (ie, pretrial recruitment) levels of understanding and knowledge about placebos. The present online survey aimed to assess knowledge about placebos among patients with a history of back pain.

DESIGN

A 15-item questionnaire was constructed to measure knowledge about placebos. Additional questions assessed sociodemographic characteristics, duration and severity of back pain, and previous experience of receiving placebos.

SETTING

Participants recruited from community settings completed the study online.

RESULTS

210 participants completed the questionnaire. 86.7% had back pain in the past 6 months, 44.3% currently had back pain. 4.3% had received a placebo intervention as part of a clinical trial and 68.1% had previously read or heard information about placebos. Overall knowledge of placebos was high, with participants on average answering 12.07 of 15 questions about placebos correctly (SD=2.35). However, few participants correctly answered questions about the nocebo effect (31.9% correct) and the impact of the colour of a placebo pill (55.2% correct).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings identified key gaps in knowledge about placebos. The lack of understanding of the nocebo effect in particular has implications for the informed consent of trial participants. Research ethics committees and investigators should prioritise amending informed consent procedures to incorporate the fact that participants in the placebo arm might experience adverse side effects.

摘要

简介

为了确保安慰剂对照临床试验的同意书充分告知患者有关安慰剂及其可能效果的信息,患者需要准确了解安慰剂。然而,以前的研究很少探讨患者在试验前招募时对安慰剂的理解和认识的基线水平。本项在线调查旨在评估有背痛病史患者对安慰剂的了解程度。

设计

我们构建了一个包含 15 个问题的问卷来衡量对安慰剂的了解程度。其他问题评估了社会人口统计学特征、背痛的持续时间和严重程度以及接受安慰剂的既往经历。

设置

从社区环境中招募的参与者在线完成了这项研究。

结果

共有 210 名参与者完成了问卷。86.7%的人在过去 6 个月内有背痛,44.3%的人目前有背痛。4.3%的人曾接受过安慰剂干预作为临床试验的一部分,68.1%的人以前读过或听过有关安慰剂的信息。整体上对安慰剂的了解程度较高,参与者平均正确回答了 15 个关于安慰剂问题中的 12.07 个(标准差=2.35)。然而,很少有参与者正确回答了关于反安慰剂效应(31.9%正确)和安慰剂丸颜色影响的问题(55.2%正确)。

结论

研究结果确定了对安慰剂了解方面的一些关键差距。特别是对反安慰剂效应缺乏了解,这对试验参与者的知情同意产生了影响。研究伦理委员会和研究人员应优先考虑修改知情同意程序,以纳入安慰剂组参与者可能会出现不良副作用的事实。

相似文献

1
What trial participants need to be told about placebo effects to give informed consent: a survey to establish existing knowledge among patients with back pain.为了让试验参与者在知情同意的情况下了解安慰剂效应,他们需要知道什么:一项针对腰痛患者现有知识的调查。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):867-870. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103964. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
2
Informing Adults With Back Pain About Placebo Effects: Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a New Website With Potential to Improve Informed Consent in Clinical Research.向背痛成年人告知安慰剂效应:对一个有潜力改善临床研究知情同意情况的新网站进行随机对照评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 17;21(1):e9955. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9955.
3
The Ethics of Placebo Effects in Clinical Practice and Research.安慰剂效应在临床实践和研究中的伦理问题。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:463-484. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Positive Treatment Expectancies Reduce Clinical Pain and Perceived Limitations in Movement Ability Despite Increased Experimental Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Sham Opioid Infusion in Patients with Chronic Back Pain.积极的治疗预期可减轻慢性腰痛患者接受模拟阿片输注时的临床疼痛和运动能力受限的感知,尽管实验性疼痛增加:一项随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(4):203-214. doi: 10.1159/000501385. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Understanding of placebo controls among older people with schizophrenia.对老年精神分裂症患者中安慰剂对照的理解。
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Jan;32(1):137-46. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbi069. Epub 2005 Sep 21.
6
Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.知情同意和安慰剂效应:信息传单的内容分析,以确定临床试验参与者被告知安慰剂的情况。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039661. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
Nocebo and lessebo effects.厌恶效应和减效效应。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;153:121-146. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa.南非流感疫苗试验中的知情同意与参与者认知
J Med Ethics. 2005 Dec;31(12):727-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009910.
9
Assessing knowledge about acupuncture: A survey of people with back pain in the UK.评估对针灸的了解:对英国背痛患者的一项调查。
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Dec;29:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
10
Do randomized clinical trials with inadequate blinding report enhanced placebo effects for intervention groups and nocebo effects for placebo groups?在盲法不充分的随机临床试验中,干预组是否报告了增强的安慰剂效应,而安慰剂组是否报告了反安慰剂效应?
Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 21;3:14. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Justice for Placebo: Placebo Effect in Clinical Trials and Everyday Practice.安慰剂的公平性:临床试验和日常医疗实践中的安慰剂效应
Medicines (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;12(1):5. doi: 10.3390/medicines12010005.
2
Lessons learned from examination of Canadian medico-legal cases related to interventional therapies for chronic pain management.从加拿大涉及慢性疼痛管理介入治疗的法医案例中吸取的教训。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Sep;70(9):1504-1515. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02531-1. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Explaining placebo effects in an online survey study: Does 'Pavlov' ring a bell?在一项在线调查研究中解释安慰剂效应:“巴甫洛夫”有共鸣吗?
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247103. eCollection 2021.
4
Can an Open-Label Placebo Be as Effective as a Deceptive Placebo? Methodological Considerations of a Study Protocol.开放标签安慰剂能否与欺骗性安慰剂一样有效?一项研究方案的方法学考量。
Medicines (Basel). 2020 Jan 2;7(1):3. doi: 10.3390/medicines7010003.
5
The Knowledge of Contextual Factors as Triggers of Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Patients With Musculoskeletal Pain: Findings From a National Survey.肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中作为安慰剂和反安慰剂效应触发因素的情境因素知识:一项全国性调查的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 4;10:478. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00478. eCollection 2019.
6
Informing Adults With Back Pain About Placebo Effects: Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a New Website With Potential to Improve Informed Consent in Clinical Research.向背痛成年人告知安慰剂效应:对一个有潜力改善临床研究知情同意情况的新网站进行随机对照评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 17;21(1):e9955. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9955.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of a proposed trial of acupuncture as an adjunct to lifestyle interventions for weight loss in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a qualitative study.多囊卵巢综合征患者生活方式干预辅助针刺减肥试验的可行性和可接受性:一项定性研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Nov 8;18(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2358-7.
8
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.与失败的临床试验相关的因素及提高成功可能性的机会:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain.情境因素作为肌肉骨骼疼痛中安慰剂和反安慰剂效应触发因素的临床相关性
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed consent and clinical trials: where is the placebo effect?知情同意与临床试验:安慰剂效应何在?
BMJ. 2017 Feb 3;356:j463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j463.
2
Assessing knowledge about acupuncture: A survey of people with back pain in the UK.评估对针灸的了解:对英国背痛患者的一项调查。
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Dec;29:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory.实证伦理研究的规范背景:迈向伦理理论选择中透明且合理方法的第一步。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Apr 4;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0016-x.
4
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
5
Placebo and nocebo effects in randomized controlled trials: the implications for research and practice.随机对照试验中的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应:对研究和实践的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):722-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
6
Nocebo phenomena in medicine: their relevance in everyday clinical practice.医学中的反安慰剂现象:其在日常临床实践中的相关性。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Jun;109(26):459-65. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0459. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos.知情同意和安慰剂效应:信息传单的内容分析,以确定临床试验参与者被告知安慰剂的情况。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039661. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
8
A meta-analytic approach to estimating nocebo effects in neuropathic pain trials.一种估计神经性疼痛试验中反安慰剂效应的荟萃分析方法。
J Neurol. 2012 Mar;259(3):436-47. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6197-4. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
The Epidemiology of low back pain.腰痛的流行病学。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;24(6):769-81. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002.
10
Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects.安慰剂效应的生物学、临床和伦理进展。
Lancet. 2010 Feb 20;375(9715):686-95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61706-2.