The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney Australia.
Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre, Health Market Quality Program, Sydney, Australia.
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):499-505. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7464.
Studies of low-value care have focused on the prevalence of low-value care interventions but have rarely quantified downstream consequences of these interventions for patients or the health care system.
To measure immediate in-hospital harm associated with 7 low-value procedures.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort study with a descriptive analysis using hospital admission data from 225 public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, was conducted from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2017. All 9330 episodes involving 1 of 7 low-value procedures were evaluated, including endoscopy for dyspepsia in people younger than 55 years (3689 episodes); knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis or meniscal tears (3963 episodes); colonoscopy for constipation in people younger than 50 years (665 episodes); endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic, high-risk patients (508 episodes); carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic, high-risk patients (273 episodes); renal artery angioplasty (176 episodes); and spinal fusion for uncomplicated low back pain (56 episodes). Sixteen hospital-acquired complications (HACs) were used as a measure of harm associated with low-value care.
For each low-value procedure, the percentage associated with any HAC and the difference in mean length of stay for patients receiving low-value care with and without HACs were calculated.
Across the 225 hospitals and 9330 episodes of low-value care, rates of HACs were low for low-value endoscopy (4 [0.1%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.02%-0.2%), knee arthroscopy (18 [0.5%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.2%-0.7%), and colonoscopy (2 [0.3%] episodes; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.9%) but higher for low-value spinal fusion (4 [7.1%] episodes; 95% CI, 2.2%-11.5%), endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (76 [15.0%] episodes; 95% CI, 11.1%-19.7%), carotid endarterectomy (21 [7.7%] episodes; 95% CI, 5.2%-10.1%), and renal artery angioplasty (15 [8.5%] episodes; 95% CI, 5.8%-11.5%). For most procedures, the most common HAC was health care-associated infection, which accounted for 83 (26.3%) (95% CI, 21.8%-31.5%) of all HACs observed. The highest rate of health care-associated infection was 8.4% (95% CI, 5.2%-11.4%) for renal artery angioplasty. For all 7 low-value procedures, median length of stay for patients with an HAC was 2 times or more the median length of stay for patients without a complication. For example, median length of stay was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-1) day for knee arthroscopy with no HACs but increased to 10.5 (IQR, 1.0-21.3) days for patients with an HAC.
These findings suggest that use of these 7 procedures in patients who probably should not receive them is harming some of those patients, consuming additional hospital resources, and potentially delaying care for other patients for whom the services would be appropriate. Although only some immediate consequences of just 7 low-value services were examined, harm related to all low-value procedures was noted, including high rates of harm for certain higher-risk procedures. The full burden of low-value care for patients and the health system is yet to be quantified.
重要性:关于低价值医疗的研究主要集中在低价值医疗干预措施的流行程度上,但很少有研究量化这些干预措施对患者或医疗体系的下游后果。
目的:测量 7 种低价值手术立即产生的院内伤害。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究采用描述性分析,使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州 225 家公立医院的入院数据,从 2014 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日进行。评估了 7 种低价值手术中的所有 9330 例,包括 55 岁以下消化不良患者的内镜检查(3689 例);骨关节炎或半月板撕裂的膝关节镜检查(3963 例);50 岁以下便秘患者的结肠镜检查(665 例);无症状高危患者腹主动脉瘤的血管内修复术(508 例);无症状高危患者颈动脉内膜切除术(273 例);肾动脉血管成形术(176 例);和单纯性腰痛的脊柱融合术(56 例)。16 种医院获得性并发症(HACs)被用作与低价值护理相关伤害的衡量标准。
主要结果和措施:对于每种低价值手术,计算了任何 HAC 相关的百分比,以及接受低价值护理的患者与没有 HAC 的患者之间平均住院时间的差异。
结果:在 225 家医院和 9330 例低价值护理病例中,低价值内镜检查(4 [0.1%] 例;95%CI,0.02%-0.2%)、膝关节镜检查(18 [0.5%] 例;95%CI,0.2%-0.7%)和结肠镜检查(2 [0.3%] 例;95%CI,0.0%-0.9%)的 HAC 发生率较低,但低价值脊柱融合术(4 [7.1%] 例;95%CI,2.2%-11.5%)、腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术(76 [15.0%] 例;95%CI,11.1%-19.7%)、颈动脉内膜切除术(21 [7.7%] 例;95%CI,5.2%-10.1%)和肾动脉血管成形术(15 [8.5%] 例;95%CI,5.8%-11.5%)的 HAC 发生率较高。对于大多数手术,最常见的 HAC 是医源性感染,占所有观察到的 HAC 的 83 例(26.3%)(95%CI,21.8%-31.5%)。医源性感染的发生率最高为肾动脉血管成形术的 8.4%(95%CI,5.2%-11.4%)。对于所有 7 种低价值手术,有 HAC 的患者的中位住院时间是无并发症患者的中位数住院时间的 2 倍或以上。例如,无 HAC 的膝关节镜检查的中位住院时间为 1 天(四分位间距[IQR],1-1 天),但有 HAC 的患者增加到 10.5 天(IQR,1.0-21.3 天)。
结论和相关性:这些发现表明,在可能不应该接受这些手术的患者中使用这 7 种手术正在伤害其中一些患者,消耗额外的医院资源,并可能延误其他患者的治疗。尽管只检查了 7 种低价值服务中的一些即时后果,但注意到与所有低价值手术相关的伤害,包括某些高风险手术的高伤害率。患者和医疗体系低价值护理的全部负担尚未量化。