• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定衡量低价值医疗的指标:将明智选择推荐映射到医院数据

Developing indicators for measuring low-value care: mapping Choosing Wisely recommendations to hospital data.

作者信息

Chalmers Kelsey, Badgery-Parker Tim, Pearson Sallie-Anne, Brett Jonathan, Scott Ian A, Elshaug Adam G

机构信息

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Health Market Quality Program, Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2018 Mar 5;11(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3270-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-018-3270-4
PMID:29506573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5836437/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low-value health care refers to interventions where the risk of harm or costs exceeds the likely benefit for a patient. We aimed to develop indicators of low-value care, based on selected Choosing Wisely (CW) recommendations, applicable to routinely collected, hospital claims data.

RESULTS

We assessed 824 recommendations from the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom CW lists regarding their capacity to be measured in administrative hospital admissions datasets. We selected recommendations if they met the following criteria: the service occurred in the hospital setting (observable in setting); a claim recorded the use of the service (record of service); the appropriate/inappropriate use of the service could be mapped to information within the hospital claim (indication); and the service is consistently recorded in the claims (consistent documentation). We identified 17 recommendations (15 services) as measurable. We then developed low-value care indicators for two hospital datasets based on the selected recommendations, previously published indicators, and clinical input.

摘要

目的

低价值医疗保健是指对患者造成伤害的风险或成本超过可能带来的益处的干预措施。我们旨在根据选定的“明智选择”(CW)建议,制定适用于常规收集的医院理赔数据的低价值医疗保健指标。

结果

我们评估了来自美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和英国CW清单的824条建议,以确定它们在医院行政入院数据集里的可测量性。如果建议符合以下标准,我们就会选择它们:该服务发生在医院环境中(在环境中可观察到);理赔记录了该服务的使用情况(服务记录);该服务的适当/不适当使用可以映射到医院理赔中的信息(指征);并且该服务在理赔中得到一致记录(一致的文档记录)。我们确定了17条可测量的建议(15项服务)。然后,我们根据选定的建议、先前公布的指标和临床意见,为两个医院数据集制定了低价值医疗保健指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/5836437/aac0a75cbe8b/13104_2018_3270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/5836437/4825e68fed7b/13104_2018_3270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/5836437/aac0a75cbe8b/13104_2018_3270_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/5836437/4825e68fed7b/13104_2018_3270_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9be/5836437/aac0a75cbe8b/13104_2018_3270_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing indicators for measuring low-value care: mapping Choosing Wisely recommendations to hospital data.制定衡量低价值医疗的指标:将明智选择推荐映射到医院数据
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Mar 5;11(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3270-4.
2
The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.明智选择干预措施对低价值医疗服务的影响:系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
3
Measuring 21 low-value hospital procedures: claims analysis of Australian private health insurance data (2010-2014).测量 21 项低价值医院操作:澳大利亚私人健康保险数据的理赔分析(2010-2014 年)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e024142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024142.
4
Recommendations for Choosing Wisely in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Five Opportunities to Improve Value.《儿科急诊医学中的明智选择建议:五个改善价值的机会》。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;84(2):167-175. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
5
Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States.明智选择:美国低价值医疗服务的患病率及其相关因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):221-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3070-z. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Comparison of Payment Changes and Choosing Wisely Recommendations for Use of Low-Value Laboratory Tests in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大在低价值实验室检测的应用方面,对支付方式变化和明智选择建议的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):524-531. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7143.
7
Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.理解低价值医疗保健及相关的去执行过程:加拿大医院选择明智干预措施的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07485-6.
8
Patient and family involvement in Choosing Wisely initiatives: a mixed methods study.患者和家属参与明智选择倡议:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07861-2.
9
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
10
Quality Indicators Targeting Low-Value Clinical Practices in Trauma Care.创伤护理中针对低价值临床实践的质量指标。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):507-514. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0812.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilisation of a cocreation methodology to develop claims-based indicators for feedback on implementation of comparative effectiveness research results into practice.运用共同创造方法来制定基于索赔的指标,以反馈比较效果研究结果在实践中的实施情况。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 6;14(1):e002542. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002542.
2
Selecting indicators for the measurement of low-value care using German claims data: A three-round modified Delphi panel.利用德国理赔数据选择低价值医疗测量指标:三轮改良德尔菲专家小组法
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 18;20(2):e0314864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314864. eCollection 2025.
3
Monitoring low-value care in medical patients from Swiss university hospitals using a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) national data stream and patient and public involvement: LUCID study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
A Framework for Measuring Low-Value Care.衡量低价值医疗服务的框架。
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):375-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
2
Quantifying low-value care: a patient-centric versus service-centric lens.量化低价值医疗:以患者为中心与以服务为中心的视角
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Oct;26(10):855-858. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006678. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
3
A methodological protocol for selecting and quantifying low-value prescribing practices in routinely collected data: an Australian case study.一种用于在常规收集的数据中选择和量化低价值处方行为的方法学方案:一项澳大利亚案例研究。
利用可查找、可访问、可互操作、可重用(FAIR)的国家数据流以及患者和公众参与,监测瑞士大学医院内科患者的低价值医疗:LUCID研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e089662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089662.
4
Perspectives on low-value care and barriers to de-implementation among primary care physicians: a multinational survey.基层医疗医生对低价值医疗的看法和去执行障碍:一项多国调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 9;25(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02382-9.
5
Multicomponent processes to identify and prioritise low-value care in hospital settings: a scoping review.多组分流程在医院环境下识别和优先考虑低价值医疗服务:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):e078761. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078761.
6
Measuring low-value care in hospital discharge records: evidence from China.利用医院出院记录衡量低价值医疗服务:来自中国的证据。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Aug 31;38:100887. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100887. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Quality of life in children and adolescents with hemophilia A: A systematic review and meta-analysis.甲型血友病儿童和青少年的生活质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Dec 9;7(1):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2022.100008. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
The value of reducing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the treatment of degenerative meniscus tears: a budget impact analysis.减少关节镜下半月板部分切除术治疗退行性半月板撕裂的价值:预算影响分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jan 18;39(1):e7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322003361.
9
Health service research definition builder: An R Shiny application for exploring diagnosis codes associated with services reported in routinely collected health data.健康服务研究定义生成器:一个用于探索与常规收集的健康数据中报告的服务相关的诊断代码的 R Shiny 应用程序。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 12;18(1):e0266154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266154. eCollection 2023.
10
Association Between Low- and High-Value Medication and Hospital Referrals by General Practitioners in Patients Living with Dementia.痴呆症患者中低价值和高价值药物与全科医生转诊至医院之间的关联
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2022 Oct 18;6(1):641-650. doi: 10.3233/ADR-220004. eCollection 2022.
Implement Sci. 2017 May 3;12(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0585-9.
4
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.世界各地医疗服务过度使用的证据。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with myocardial infarction using deterministic record linkage.使用确定性记录链接比较常规管理数据与注册数据以评估心肌梗死患者的医院护理质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1840-5.
6
Choosing Wisely®: A case study of constructive engagement in health policy.明智选择:建设性参与健康政策的案例研究。
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Sep;4(3):240-3. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
Are low-value care measures up to the task? A systematic review of the literature.低价值医疗措施能否胜任这项任务?一项文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1656-3.
8
Evaluating Two Measures of Lumbar Spine MRI Overuse: Administrative Data Versus Chart Review.评估腰椎磁共振成像过度使用的两种测量方法:行政数据与病历审查。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1057-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Quantifying low-value services by using routine data from Austrian primary care.利用奥地利初级保健的常规数据对低价值服务进行量化。
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Dec;26(6):912-916. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw080. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
Developing and Testing an Electronic Measure of Screening Colonoscopy Overuse in a Large Integrated Healthcare System.在一个大型综合医疗系统中开发并测试一种用于筛查结肠镜检查过度使用情况的电子测量方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Apr;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3569-y.