Suppr超能文献

皮肤色素沉着面积和严重程度指数的可靠性评估和验证:一种新的获得性皮肤黄斑性色素沉着的评分方法。

Reliability assessment and validation of the dermal pigmentation area and severity index: a new scoring method for acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Jul;33(7):1386-1392. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15516. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermal pigmentation area and severity score (DPASI) is a recently proposed scoring system for acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation (ADMH).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability and validity of DPASI.

METHODS

After standardized training, three researchers independently rated 55 patients with ADMH on two consecutive days within 1 week, to determine intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Validation was performed by comparing DPASI with the physician global assessment score.

RESULTS

Test-retest reliability of individual raters tested by Pearson's r showed good correlation for all three raters (r = 0.984, P < 0.0001; r = 0.983, P < 0.000 and r = 0.970, P < 0.0001). Inter-rater agreement computed by intra-class correlation coefficient also showed good correlation (ICC = 0.997, P < 0.0001). Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.997. The score faired well in face and content validity (I-CVI of 0.87). On usability assessment, the scale had a median score of 4 on a scale from 1 to 5. The meantime taken to score the patients were 307.2 ± 83, 308.9 ± 84.4, 350.15 ± 91.8 s by three observers, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DPASI is a reliable measure of ADMH severity. The use of dermoscopy decreases inter and intra-observer variation resulting in a more objective score.

摘要

背景

皮肤色素沉着面积和严重程度评分(DPASI)是最近提出的一种用于评估获得性真皮斑状色素沉着(ADMH)的评分系统。

目的

确定 DPASI 的可靠性和有效性。

方法

在标准化培训后,3 名研究人员在 1 周内连续 2 天对 55 例 ADMH 患者进行独立评分,以确定组内和组间的可靠性。通过将 DPASI 与医生整体评估评分进行比较来进行验证。

结果

Pearson r 检验单个评分者的测试-重测信度显示所有 3 名评分者的相关性均较好(r=0.984,P<0.0001;r=0.983,P<0.000 和 r=0.970,P<0.0001)。组内相关系数计算的组间一致性也显示出较好的相关性(ICC=0.997,P<0.0001)。内部一致性通过 Cronbach's alpha 进行测量,结果为 0.997。该评分在面部和内容有效性方面表现良好(I-CVI 为 0.87)。在可用性评估中,该量表的得分为 1 到 5 的中位数为 4。3 名观察者分别为 307.2±83、308.9±84.4 和 350.15±91.8 秒。

结论

DPASI 是评估 ADMH 严重程度的可靠指标。使用皮肤镜可减少观察者内和观察者间的差异,从而使评分更客观。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验