Suppr超能文献

急性心力衰竭患者的肾功能恶化:心脏生物标志物的重要性。

Worsening renal failure in patients with acute heart failure: the importance of cardiac biomarkers.

机构信息

Division of Intensive Care Unit, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):416-427. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12414. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

Abstract

AIMS

The importance of true worsening renal failure (WRF), which is associated with a poor prognosis, had been suggested in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The aim of the present study was to establish the biomarker strategy for the prediction of true WRF in AHF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-one patients with AHF were analysed. Their biomarkers were measured within 30 min of admission. Patients were assigned to the non-WRF (n = 168), pseudo-WRF (n = 56), or true-WRF (n = 57) groups using the criteria of both acute kidney injury on admission and increasing serum creatinine value during the first 7 days. A Kaplan-Meier curve showed that the survival and heart failure event rate of the true-WRF group within 1000 days was significantly lower than that of the non-WRF and pseudo-WRF groups (P ≤ 0.001). The multivariate Cox regression model also indicated that true WRF was an independent predictor of 1000 day mortality and heart failure events [hazard ratio: 4.315, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.466-7.550, P ≤ 0.001, and hazard ratio: 2.834, 95% CI: 1.893-4.243, P ≤ 0.001, respectively]. The serum heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (s-HFABP) levels were significantly higher in the true-WRF group than in the non-WRF and pseudo-WRF groups (P ≤ 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression model indicated that the predictive biomarker for the true-WRF group was the s-HFABP level (odds ratio: 5.472, 95% CI: 2.729-10.972, P ≤ 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for indicating the presence of true WRF were 73.7% and 76.8% (area under the curve = 0.831) for s-HFABP in whole patients, respectively, and 94.7% and 72.7% (area under the curve = 0.904) in non-chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac biomarkers, especially the s-HFABP, might predict the development of true WRF in AHF patients. Furthermore, the predictive value was higher in AHF patients without CKD than in those with CKD.

摘要

目的

急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者中,与预后不良相关的真正肾功能恶化(WRF)的重要性已被提出。本研究旨在建立预测 AHF 中真正 WRF 的生物标志物策略。

方法和结果

对 281 例 AHF 患者进行分析。患者入院后 30 分钟内测量其生物标志物。根据入院时急性肾损伤和第 1 天至第 7 天期间血清肌酐值升高的标准,将患者分为非 WRF(n=168)、假性 WRF(n=56)或真 WRF(n=57)组。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,在 1000 天内,真 WRF 组的生存率和心力衰竭事件发生率明显低于非 WRF 和假性 WRF 组(P≤0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归模型还表明,真正的 WRF 是 1000 天死亡率和心力衰竭事件的独立预测因子[风险比:4.315,95%置信区间(CI):2.466-7.550,P≤0.001,风险比:2.834,95%CI:1.893-4.243,P≤0.001]。真 WRF 组的血清心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(s-HFABP)水平明显高于非 WRF 和假性 WRF 组(P≤0.001)。多变量逻辑回归模型表明,真正 WRF 组的预测生物标志物是 s-HFABP 水平(优势比:5.472,95%CI:2.729-10.972,P≤0.001)。在所有患者中,s-HFABP 指示真正 WRF 存在的敏感性和特异性分别为 73.7%和 76.8%(曲线下面积为 0.831),在非慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中分别为 94.7%和 72.7%(曲线下面积为 0.904)。

结论

心脏生物标志物,尤其是 s-HFABP,可能预测 AHF 患者真正 WRF 的发生。此外,在没有 CKD 的 AHF 患者中,其预测价值高于 CKD 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6c/6437438/a30c36146e99/EHF2-6-416-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验