Sahar Muhammad Sana Ullah, Barton Matthew, Tansley Geoffrey Douglas
School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Clem Jones Centre for Neurobiology and Stem Cell Therapies, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Neural Regen Res. 2019 Jul;14(7):1109-1115. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.251186.
Peripheral nerve injuries are relatively common and can be caused by a variety of traumatic events such as motor vehicle accidents. They can lead to long-term disability, pain, and financial burden, and contribute to poor quality of life. In this review, we systematically analyze the contemporary literature on peripheral nerve gap management using nerve prostheses in conjunction with physical therapeutic agents. The use of nerve prostheses to assist nerve regeneration across large gaps (> 30 mm) has revolutionized neural surgery. The materials used for nerve prostheses have been greatly refined, making them suitable for repairing large nerve gaps. However, research on peripheral nerve gap management using nerve prostheses reports inconsistent functional outcomes, especially when prostheses are integrated with physical therapeutic agents, and thus warrants careful investigation. This review explores the effectiveness of nerve prostheses for bridging large nerve gaps and then addresses their use in combination with physical therapeutic agents.
周围神经损伤相对常见,可由多种创伤性事件引起,如机动车事故。它们可导致长期残疾、疼痛和经济负担,并导致生活质量下降。在本综述中,我们系统地分析了当代关于使用神经假体结合物理治疗剂进行周围神经间隙管理的文献。使用神经假体辅助神经跨越较大间隙(>30毫米)再生彻底改变了神经外科手术。用于神经假体的材料已得到极大改进,使其适用于修复大的神经间隙。然而,关于使用神经假体进行周围神经间隙管理的研究报告的功能结果并不一致,尤其是当假体与物理治疗剂联合使用时,因此值得仔细研究。本综述探讨了神经假体桥接大神经间隙的有效性,然后讨论了其与物理治疗剂联合使用的情况。