Akhter Saima, Warraich Usman Ali, Ghazal Shaista, Rizvi Nadeem
Ziauddin University and Hospital.
Visiting Faculty, Iqra University.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Feb;69(2):211-215.
To assess and compare the role of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Confusion Urea Respiratory Rate Blood Pressure scores in predicting inpatient mortality for patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease..
The retrospective study was conducted at the Jinnah Post-graduate Medical Centre, Karachi, and comprised data of all consecutive Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients from December 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Logistic regression model and non-parametric tests were employed using SPSS 22..
There were 95 patients whose medical records were studied. The overall mean age was 60.79±12.39 years. Mortality rate was of 26(27.6%). Median hospital stay was 11.5 days (interquartile range: 9-17 days) in survivors and 4 days (2-8 days) in non-survivors. Out of the three scales used, Confusion Urea Respiratory Rate Blood Pressure-65 score showed the greatest difference between survivors and non-survivors (p <0.05). Significant higher scores were observed in non survivors with Type 2 than Type 1 respiratory failure (p<0.05). There was significant association of mortality with baseline partial pressure of oxygen and oxygen saturation (p<0.05 each).
Confusion Urea Respiratory Rate Blood Pressure-65score determined at the time of admission had significant ability to predict inpatient mortality..
评估并比较急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)以及意识模糊、尿素氮、呼吸频率、血压(CURB-65)评分在预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者住院死亡率中的作用。
本回顾性研究在卡拉奇真纳研究生医学中心开展,纳入了2013年12月1日至2014年12月31日期间所有连续收治的AECOPD患者的数据。使用SPSS 22软件进行逻辑回归模型和非参数检验。
共研究了95例患者的病历。总体平均年龄为60.79±12.39岁。死亡率为26例(27.6%)。幸存者的中位住院时间为11.5天(四分位间距:9 - 17天),非幸存者为4天(2 - 8天)。在所使用的三个量表中,CURB-65评分在幸存者和非幸存者之间显示出最大差异(p<0.05)。2型呼吸衰竭的非幸存者得分显著高于1型呼吸衰竭患者(p<0.05)。死亡率与基线氧分压和氧饱和度显著相关(均p<0.05)。
入院时测定的CURB-65评分具有显著预测住院死亡率的能力。