Suppr超能文献

在科学文本中生成因果关系:成功生成的长期优势。

Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation.

作者信息

Abel Roman, Hänze Martin

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 5;10:199. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00199. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

A high level of text comprehension can be achieved by engaging learners in processes of organization and integration while reading a cohesive text. In the present study, we investigated the impact of an innovative generative technique on learning with scientific texts. The was implemented by means of cohesion gaps. High school students ( = 199) were randomly assigned to either receive a fully cohesive scientific text (control condition) or a scientific text that required the selection of causal connectives, such as , , , or (generation condition). Learners in the generation condition were required to reflect on causal relations to complete the text. All students were tested immediately (T1) and 2 weeks after the learning phase (T2). Cognitive load was measured by a dual task and self-report measure. Contrary to our expectations, no differences were found in performance on inference questions (situation model). Learners in the generation condition performed worse on text-based questions at T1 but showed less forgetting from T1 to T2. The impact of condition on the situation model was moderated by reading skills. Remarkably, the generation success was highly predictive for learning outcomes even when controlling for learners' proficiencies. Consequently, learners who succeeded to employ effortful processes to overcome the difficulty showed a superior performance on both the text-base and situation-model questions compared to students reading the cohesive text. Moreover, in these learners, generative activity led to a sustainable learning performance 2 weeks later. Poor readers especially took advantage of generative activity, despite struggling to perform the cohesion task as indicated by the cognitive load measures. The results suggest that the activity of generating causal relations can augment inferential processing in learners who are not involved in inferential processing spontaneously. To successfully apply this generative learning technique, students require considerable instructional support.

摘要

在阅读连贯文本时,让学习者参与组织和整合过程,可以实现较高水平的文本理解。在本研究中,我们调查了一种创新的生成技术对科学文本学习的影响。该技术通过衔接间隙来实施。199名高中生被随机分配,要么阅读完全连贯的科学文本(控制组),要么阅读需要选择因果连接词(如because、since、therefore或thus)的科学文本(生成组)。生成组的学习者需要思考因果关系来完成文本。所有学生在学习阶段后立即进行测试(T1),并在2周后进行测试(T2)。通过双重任务和自我报告测量来衡量认知负荷。与我们的预期相反,在推理问题(情境模型)的表现上未发现差异。生成组的学习者在T1时基于文本的问题上表现较差,但从T1到T2的遗忘较少。条件对情境模型的影响受到阅读技能的调节。值得注意的是,即使控制学习者的熟练程度,生成成功对学习成果也具有高度预测性。因此,与阅读连贯文本的学生相比,成功运用努力过程克服困难的学习者在基于文本和情境模型的问题上都表现更优。此外,在这些学习者中,生成活动在2周后带来了可持续的学习表现。尽管从认知负荷测量来看,阅读能力较差的学生在完成衔接任务时很吃力,但他们尤其从生成活动中受益。结果表明,生成因果关系的活动可以增强那些没有自发参与推理过程的学习者的推理处理能力。为了成功应用这种生成性学习技术,学生需要大量的教学支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7907/6370711/ed954da680b3/fpsyg-10-00199-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验