Schindler Julia, Richter Tobias
Department of Psychology IV, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Education and Psychology/Special Needs Education, Free University of Berlin, Fabeckstraße 35, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 23;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00645-2.
The aim of the present study was to test the replicability of the text generation effect for learning with expository texts while systematically varying contextual factors that-based on extant literature-can be assumed to affect the occurrence and magnitude of the text generation effect. Seven experiments were conducted in which participants either read (control condition) or unscrambled sentences (generation condition) in expository texts. The experiments varied systematically on intentionality of learning, learning time constraint, retention interval, and study design. Contrary to expectations, no text generation effect could be found. Instead, some of the experiments even revealed a learning disadvantage for text generation compared to the reading control condition. In only one experiment (Experiment 6) and for just one of the learning measures, learners performed better when they had generated the texts. In sum, the results indicate that a generation effect is most likely to occur when learning is intentional, when learning time is unrestricted, and for immediate testing. The findings suggest that the applications of text generation in educational contexts are rather limited.
本研究的目的是检验说明文学习中文本生成效应的可重复性,同时系统地改变一些情境因素,基于现有文献,可以假定这些因素会影响文本生成效应的发生及其程度。我们进行了七项实验,参与者在实验中要么阅读说明文(控制条件),要么整理说明文中的句子(生成条件)。这些实验在学习的意向性、学习时间限制、保持间隔和研究设计方面进行了系统的变化。与预期相反,未发现文本生成效应。相反,一些实验甚至表明,与阅读控制条件相比,文本生成在学习方面存在劣势。仅在一项实验(实验6)中,且仅就其中一项学习测量指标而言,学习者在生成文本时表现更好。总之,结果表明,当学习是有意的、学习时间不受限制且进行即时测试时,最有可能出现生成效应。研究结果表明,文本生成在教育环境中的应用相当有限。