Rodríguez-Mañero Moisés, Kreidieh Bahij, Valderrábano Miguel, Baluja Aurora, Martínez-Sande Jose Luis, García-Seara Javier, Díaz-Fernández Brais, Pereira-Vázquez María, Lage Ricardo, González-Melchor Laila, Fernández-López Xesús A, González-Juanatey José Ramón
Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology Cardiology Department University Hospital Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS) Universidad de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain.
J Arrhythm. 2018 Sep 3;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12113. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Supraventricular arrhythmias are common in Brugada syndrome (BS), and notoriously difficult to manage with medical therapy secondary to associated risks. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often utilized instead, but its outcomes in this population are not well-known. We aim to provide a holistic evaluation of interventional treatment for Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the BS population. Electronic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Cochrane, and Scopus were systematically searched for publications between 01/01/1995 and 12/31/2017. Studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 49 patients with BS and AF were included. Age range from 28.8 to 64 years, and 77.5% were male. 38 patients were implanted with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) at baseline, and of them, 39% suffered inappropriate shocks for rapid AF. 34/49 (69%) of patients achieved remission following a single PVI procedure. Of the remaining, 13 patients underwent one or more repeat ablation procedures. Overall, 45/49 (91.8%) of patients remained in remission during long-term follow-up after one or more PVI procedures in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Postablation, no patients suffered inappropriate ICD shock. Furthermore, no major complications secondary to PVI occurred in any patient. AF ablation achieves acute and long-term success in the vast majority of patients. It is effective in preventing inappropriate ICD therapy secondary to rapid AF. Complication rates of PVI in BS are low. Thus, in light of the risks of AADs and risk of inappropriate ICD shocks in the BS population, catheter ablation could represent an appropriate first-line therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in BS patients.
室上性心律失常在Brugada综合征(BS)中很常见,由于相关风险,药物治疗 notoriously difficult to manage。相反,肺静脉隔离(PVI)经常被采用,但其在该人群中的疗效尚不清楚。我们旨在全面评估BS人群中房颤(AF)的介入治疗。对电子数据库Medline、Embase、Cinahl、Cochrane和Scopus进行系统检索,查找1995年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间的出版物。根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准筛选研究。共纳入49例BS合并AF患者。年龄范围为28.8至64岁,77.5%为男性。38例患者在基线时植入了植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),其中39%因快速房颤遭受不适当电击。49例患者中有34例(69%)在单次PVI手术后实现缓解。其余患者中,13例接受了一次或多次重复消融手术。总体而言,49例患者中有45例(91.8%)在未使用抗心律失常药物(AAD)治疗的情况下,经过一次或多次PVI手术后长期随访仍处于缓解状态。消融术后,无患者遭受不适当的ICD电击。此外,没有患者发生继发于PVI的重大并发症。房颤消融在绝大多数患者中取得了急性和长期成功。它有效地预防了继发于快速房颤的不适当ICD治疗。BS中PVI的并发症发生率较低。因此,鉴于BS人群中AAD的风险和不适当ICD电击的风险,导管消融可能是BS患者阵发性房颤的合适一线治疗方法。