Department of Ophthalmology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California; Eye Monitoring Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Baldwin Park, California; Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, California.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness & Safety Research, Pasadena, California.
Ophthalmology. 2019 Mar;126(3):355-361. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
To evaluate the relationship between preoperative vision and surgeon volume with visual outcomes after cataract surgery.
Retrospective cohort study.
Patients aged ≥18 years old enrolled in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health Plan who underwent cataract surgery by nontrainee surgeons.
Patients who underwent cataract surgery between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015, were included. A multivariate analysis using Generalized Additive Mixed Models was performed to determine the relationship between surgeon volume and postoperative visual acuity after controlling for patient age, preoperative visual acuity, history of diabetes, and history of diabetic retinopathy. Modeling was done for the relationship between preoperative vision and visual outcomes while controlling for surgeon volume, patient age, history of diabetes, and history of diabetic retinopathy.
Absolute letter change and percentage of patients to achieve ≥5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter gain postoperatively.
There were 103 920 cataract surgeries performed by 136 surgeons included in this analysis. Patients whose surgeons performed <91.0 surgeries/year (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.1-139; P < 0.05) gained fewer letters postoperatively than the overall average, whereas those whose surgeons performed >91 but <227 surgeries/year (95% CI, 169-∞; P < 0.05) gained more letters than average. Although statistically significant, the difference between the lowest and highest performing surgeons was approximately 1.25 letters. Surgeons who performed <110 surgeries/year (95% CI, 81.7-149; P < 0.05) had fewer patients who gained ≥5 letters. Surgeons who performed >110 but <293 surgeries/year (95% CI, 232-∞; P < 0.05) were approximately 15% more likely to have patients who gained ≥5 letters. Patients with preoperative vision <74.7 letters (95% CI, 74.7-74.8; P < 0.05) and <75.8 letters (95% CI, 75.8-75.9; P < 0.05) gained more letters and were more likely to gain ≥5 letters postoperatively, respectively.
Patients whose vision is approximately 20/32 or worse are more likely to have significant visual gains after cataract surgery. Although statistically significant differences exist in postoperative vision based on surgeon volume, these do not appear to be clinically meaningful. Overall, visual outcomes are functionally comparable across a wide range of surgeon volumes.
评估术前视力与外科医生手术量与白内障手术后视力结果之间的关系。
回顾性队列研究。
接受非受训外科医生进行白内障手术的年满 18 岁的 Kaiser Permanente 南加州健康计划患者。
纳入 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间接受白内障手术的患者。使用广义加性混合模型进行多变量分析,以确定外科医生手术量与术后视力之间的关系,同时控制患者年龄、术前视力、糖尿病史和糖尿病视网膜病变史。在控制外科医生手术量、患者年龄、糖尿病史和糖尿病视网膜病变史的情况下,对术前视力与视力结果之间的关系进行建模。
术后绝对视力变化和达到≥5 个早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究(ETDRS)视力增益的患者百分比。
本分析共纳入 136 名外科医生进行的 103920 例白内障手术。与总体平均水平相比,外科医生每年手术量<91.0 例(95%置信区间[CI],61.1-139;P<0.05)的患者术后视力恢复较差,而每年手术量>91 但<227 例(95%CI,169-∞;P<0.05)的患者术后视力恢复较好。尽管具有统计学意义,但最低和最高手术量的外科医生之间的差异约为 1.25 个字母。每年手术量<110 例(95%CI,81.7-149;P<0.05)的外科医生,视力提高≥5 个字母的患者较少。每年手术量>110 但<293 例(95%CI,232-∞;P<0.05)的外科医生,视力提高≥5 个字母的患者比例约高 15%。术前视力<74.7 个字母(95%CI,74.7-74.8;P<0.05)和<75.8 个字母(95%CI,75.8-75.9;P<0.05)的患者术后视力提高更多,分别更有可能获得≥5 个字母的视力提高。
术前视力约为 20/32 或更差的患者白内障手术后视力改善的可能性更大。尽管基于外科医生手术量的术后视力存在统计学上的显著差异,但这些差异似乎没有临床意义。总体而言,在广泛的外科医生手术量范围内,视力结果在功能上是可比的。