• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石碎裂效果的 CT 平扫定量因素。

Quantitative factors of unenhanced CT for predicting fragmenting efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pancreatic duct stones.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to the Second Military Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433 PR China.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to the Second Military Medical University, Changhai Road 168, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433 PR China.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):408.e1-408.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.018
PMID:30808501
Abstract

AIM

To find potential predictors at unenhanced computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the stone clearance rate (SCR) of pancreatic duct stones (PDS) by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 106 consecutive patients with multiple stones of maximal transverse length (MTL) 0.3-3.6 cm in pancreatic head region were enrolled. Unenhanced CT was performed both before and after ESWL therapy. All patients underwent ESWL therapy using an electromagnetic lithotripter, and were divided into three groups with threshold values of >90%, 50-90% and <50% of SCR. Factors including sex, age, MTL, mean stone density (MSD), standard deviation of stone density (SDSD), variation coefficient of stone density (VCSD), attenuation density (AD), pancreatic duct diameter (PDD), skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and number of ESWL sessions were analysed, and their impact on SCR was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. The diagnostic threshold of the independent predicting index was further calculated, and its relationship with SCR and ESWL was analysed by drawing a trend line.

RESULTS

The only significant predictor of SCR by ESWL was MSD (p<0.05). More courses of ESWL therapy are required in PDS patients with an MSD higher than the cut-off value of 375.4 HU (mean, 2.6 versus 1.8), but with a relatively lower SCR (mean, 43.96 versus 88.68%) .

CONCLUSION

MSD on pre-treatment unenhanced CT is an independent predictor for SCR of PDS patients treated with ESWL. Using a cut-off value of 375.4 HU, patients with low MSD are good candidates for ESWL therapy.

摘要

目的

在未增强的计算机断层扫描(CT)中寻找潜在的预测因子,以评估体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗胰管结石(PDS)的结石清除率(SCR)。

材料与方法

共纳入 106 例胰头部多发性结石,最大横径(MTL)为 0.3-3.6cm。所有患者均在 ESWL 治疗前后进行了未增强 CT 检查。所有患者均采用电磁碎石机进行 ESWL 治疗,并根据 SCR 的阈值分为三组,>90%、50-90%和<50%。分析了性别、年龄、MTL、平均结石密度(MSD)、结石密度标准差(SDSD)、结石密度变异系数(VCSD)、衰减密度(AD)、胰管直径(PDD)、皮肤至结石距离(SSD)和 ESWL 治疗次数等因素,并通过单因素和多因素分析评估其对 SCR 的影响。进一步计算独立预测指标的诊断阈值,并通过绘制趋势线分析其与 SCR 和 ESWL 的关系。

结果

唯一与 ESWL 相关的 SCR 显著预测因子是 MSD(p<0.05)。MSD 高于 375.4HU 截值(均值,2.6 比 1.8)的 PDS 患者需要更多的 ESWL 治疗次数,但 SCR 相对较低(均值,43.96 比 88.68%)。

结论

治疗前未增强 CT 的 MSD 是 ESWL 治疗 PDS 患者 SCR 的独立预测因子。使用 375.4HU 的截值,MSD 较低的患者是 ESWL 治疗的良好候选者。

相似文献

1
Quantitative factors of unenhanced CT for predicting fragmenting efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on pancreatic duct stones.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石碎裂效果的 CT 平扫定量因素。
Clin Radiol. 2019 May;74(5):408.e1-408.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
2
Noncontrast computed tomography factors predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in patients with pancreatic duct stones.预测胰腺管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术结果的非对比计算机断层扫描因素。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Dec;43(12):3367-3373. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1639-4.
3
Development of a novel CT-based index for predicting the number of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) sessions required for successful fragmentation of obstructing pancreatic duct stones.基于 CT 的新型指数预测预测成功破碎阻塞性胰管结石所需的体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL) 治疗次数的开发。
Pancreatology. 2024 Jun;24(4):643-648. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石:CT 纹理分析技术能否帮助预测疗效?
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
[Effect of pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on chronic pancreatitis stones].[体外冲击波碎石术治疗慢性胰腺炎结石的效果]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 1;61(7):590-595. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230212-00059.
6
Use of intravenous secretin during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to facilitate endoscopic clearance of pancreatic duct stones.在体外冲击波碎石术期间使用静脉注射生长抑素以促进内镜清除胰管结石。
Pancreatology. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):272-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for prevention of recurrent pancreatitis caused by obstructive pancreatic stones.体外冲击波碎石术预防梗阻性胰石引起的复发性胰腺炎。
Pancreas. 2010 Mar;39(2):153-5. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bb1733.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones: an observational study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石:一项观察性研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1399-1403. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1508611. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
9
A comparative study between single-operator pancreatoscopy with intraductal lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of large main pancreatic duct stones.单操作孔胰管镜下腔内碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗大型主胰管结石的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3217-3226. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08631-7. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
10
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The risk factors affecting effect of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones.影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗胰管结石效果的危险因素。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 3;25(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03801-6.
2
Pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a key technology truly improves treatment model for pancreatic stones.胰腺体外冲击波碎石术:一项关键技术切实改善了胰腺结石的治疗模式。
Med Rev (2021). 2024 Jul 15;4(6):510-521. doi: 10.1515/mr-2024-0001. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Peroral Pancreatoscopy-Guided Lithotripsy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Management of Pancreatic Duct Stones in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
经口胰管镜引导下碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗慢性胰腺炎胰管结石的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;14(9):891. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090891.
4
Assessment of pancreatic ductal stone density on non-contrast computed tomography for predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.非增强计算机断层扫描评估胰管结石密度以预测体外冲击波碎石术的疗效
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Feb 28;12(2):E274-E281. doi: 10.1055/a-2226-1464. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Predictive Factors Correlated with Successful Early Endoscopic Removal of Pancreaticolithiasis in Chronic Pancreatitis after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后慢性胰腺炎患者早期内镜成功取出胰石的相关预测因素
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;14(2):172. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020172.
6
Adverse events of pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a literature review.胰腺体外冲击波碎石术的不良反应:文献综述。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02992-0.