Suppr超能文献

包括放疗在内的局部治疗在韩国巴塞罗那肝癌临床分期C期患者中的作用:一项全国性队列分析

Role of local treatment including radiotherapy in Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage C patients: a nationwide cohort analysis in South Korea.

作者信息

Lee Jeongshim, Yoon Won Sup, Koom Woong Sub, Rim Chai Hong

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Feb 11;11:1373-1382. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S193761. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Sorafenib is recommended as the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC C). However, local treatment including radiation therapy (LRT) is also widely administered in practice. The aim of our study was to define the role of LRT among BCLC C patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the patients with HCC enrolled the Korean Central Cancer Registry from 2008 to 2014, the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted 10,580 patient data from ~50 hospitals nationwide. Among them, 3,401 patients were categorized to have BCLC C HCC. Among them, patients with information on initial treatments, defined as the first and secondary treatment within 60 days after the first treatment, were selected and classified into three initial treatment groups: LRT, sorafenib, and no treatment.

RESULTS

Among 3,401 BCLC C HCC patients, 1,486 were included in the study and the remaining patients were excluded as they did not meet the criteria (eg, underwent local treatments without radiotherapy [RT] or received chemotherapy other than sorafenib). Of these, 266 were assigned to LRT (17.9%), 316 to sorafenib (21.3%), and 904 to no treatment group (60.8%). Median survival time of the sorafenib group was shorter than that of the LRT group (3.8 vs 7.6 months, <0.001). In multivariable analysis, sorafenib group showed significantly higher risk related to mortality compared to LRT group, not only among all patients (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84) but also between subgroup cohorts with portal invasions (1.55, 1.23-1.84), with lymph node metastases (2.42, 1.53-3.83), without distant metastases (1.43, 1.10-1.87), and with distant metastases (1.57, 1.13-2.19). Additionally, no treatment group showed the worst survival among the three treatment groups not only in all patients, but also in all subgroups of patients (<0.001 in all).

CONCLUSION

LRT as an initial treatment showed survival benefit as compared to sorafenib in HCC patients of BCLC C.

摘要

目的

索拉非尼被推荐作为巴塞罗那肝癌临床分期C期(BCLC C)肝细胞癌(HCC)的标准治疗方法。然而,包括放射治疗(LRT)在内的局部治疗在实际应用中也广泛开展。我们研究的目的是明确LRT在BCLC C期患者中的作用。

患者与方法

在2008年至2014年纳入韩国中央癌症登记处的HCC患者中,韩国肝癌研究组从全国约50家医院随机提取了10580例患者的数据。其中,3401例患者被归类为BCLC C期HCC。其中,选取有初始治疗信息的患者,初始治疗定义为首次治疗后60天内的首次和二次治疗,并分为三个初始治疗组:LRT组、索拉非尼组和未治疗组。

结果

在3401例BCLC C期HCC患者中,1486例纳入研究,其余患者因不符合标准(如接受了非放射治疗的局部治疗或接受了索拉非尼以外的化疗)而被排除。其中,266例被分配至LRT组(17.9%),316例至索拉非尼组(21.3%),904例至未治疗组(60.8%)。索拉非尼组的中位生存时间短于LRT组(3.8个月对7.6个月,<0.001)。在多变量分析中,索拉非尼组与LRT组相比,不仅在所有患者中(风险比:1.50,95%置信区间:1.23 - 1.84),而且在有门静脉侵犯的亚组队列中(1.55,1.23 - 1.84)、有淋巴结转移的亚组队列中(2.42,1.53 - 3.83)、无远处转移的亚组队列中(1.43,1.10 - 1.87)以及有远处转移的亚组队列中(1.57,1.13 - 2.19),与死亡相关的风险显著更高。此外,未治疗组在三个治疗组中不仅在所有患者中,而且在所有患者亚组中的生存情况最差(所有亚组均<0.001)。

结论

在BCLC C期HCC患者中,与索拉非尼相比,LRT作为初始治疗显示出生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddfa/6376887/95e9b359749e/cmar-11-1373Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验