Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117609, Singapore.
Eur J Nutr. 2020 Mar;59(2):609-619. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01929-2. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
To explore the associations between type of milk feeding (the "nutrients") and mode of breast milk feeding (the "nursing") with child cognition.
Healthy children from the GUSTO (Growing Up in Singapore Toward healthy Outcomes) cohort participated in repeated neurodevelopmental assessments between 6 and 54 months. For "nutrients", we compared children exclusively bottle-fed according to type of milk received: formula only (n = 296) vs some/all breast milk (n = 73). For "nursing", we included only children who were fully fed breast milk, comparing those fed directly at the breast (n = 59) vs those fed partially/completely by bottle (n = 63).
Compared to infants fed formula only, those who were bottle-fed breast milk demonstrated significantly better cognitive performance on both the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) at 2 years [adjusted mean difference (95% CI) 1.36 (0.32, 2.40)], and on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (Second Edition) at 4.5 years [7.59 (1.20, 13.99)]. Children bottle-fed breast milk also demonstrated better gross motor skills at 2 years than those fed formula [1.60 (0.09, 3.10)]. Among infants fully fed breast milk, those fed directly at the breast scored higher on several memory tasks compared to children bottle-fed breast milk, including the deferred imitation task at 6 months [0.67 (0.02, 1.32)] and relational binding tasks at 6 [0.41 (0.07, 0.74)], 41 [0.67 (0.04, 1.29)] and 54 [0.12 (0.01, 0.22)] months.
Our findings suggest that nutrients in breast milk may improve general child cognition, while nursing infants directly at the breast may influence memory.
探索不同类型的奶类喂养(“营养物”)和母乳喂养方式(“哺乳”)与儿童认知之间的关联。
GUSTO(新加坡儿童健康成长研究)队列中的健康儿童在 6 至 54 个月期间接受了多次神经发育评估。对于“营养物”,我们比较了根据所接受的奶类类型进行纯奶瓶喂养的儿童:仅配方奶(n=296)与部分/全部母乳(n=73)。对于“哺乳”,我们仅纳入了完全母乳喂养的儿童,比较了直接母乳喂养(n=59)与部分/完全奶瓶喂养(n=63)的儿童。
与仅配方奶喂养的婴儿相比,奶瓶喂养母乳的婴儿在 2 岁时的贝利婴幼儿发展量表(第三版)(adjusted mean difference (95% CI) 1.36 (0.32, 2.40))和 4.5 岁时的考夫曼简明智力量表(第二版)(7.59 (1.20, 13.99))上的认知表现显著更好。奶瓶喂养母乳的婴儿在 2 岁时的粗大运动技能也优于配方奶喂养的婴儿 [1.60 (0.09, 3.10)]。在完全母乳喂养的婴儿中,与奶瓶喂养母乳的婴儿相比,直接母乳喂养的婴儿在几个记忆任务上的得分更高,包括 6 个月时的延迟模仿任务 [0.67 (0.02, 1.32)]和 6、41 和 54 个月时的关系绑定任务 [0.41 (0.07, 0.74)、0.67 (0.04, 1.29)和 0.12 (0.01, 0.22)]。
我们的研究结果表明,母乳中的营养成分可能会提高儿童的整体认知能力,而直接母乳喂养婴儿可能会影响记忆力。