a Centre of Postgraduate Medical Research & Education, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Royal London House , Bournemouth University , Bournemouth , UK.
b Centre for Conflict, Rule of Law, Faculty of Media and Communication & Society , Bournemouth University , Poole , UK.
Glob Public Health. 2019 Aug;14(8):1153-1166. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1583265. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Non-consensual sterilisation is not only a historic abuse. Cases of unethical treatment of women around the time of a pregnancy continue in the Twenty-First Century in five continents. Sterilisation is being carried out by some healthcare professionals at the time of delivery, or soon afterwards, without valid consent. A range of contemporary examples of such practices is given. Respecting women's autonomy should be the touchstone of the consent process. Avoidance of force, duress, deception and manipulation should go without saying. Ethnic minority communities and women living with HIV, in particular, are being targeted for this kind of abuse. Attempts have been made in various countries and by international professional organisations to introduce clinical guidelines to steer health professionals away from this malpractice. Survivors have sought justice in domestic and international courts. This paper critically assesses the evidence on the practical, ethical and legal issues around the handling of consent for these procedures. Suggestions are made about possible regulatory responses that address abuse, whilst maintaining access for those individuals who freely elect to undergo these procedures.
非自愿绝育不仅是一种历史上的虐待行为。在二十一世纪,仍有一些医护人员在分娩时或分娩后不久,未经有效同意就对妇女进行不道德的治疗,这种情况在五大洲都有发生。文中列举了一些当代此类做法的例子。尊重妇女的自主权应该是同意过程的试金石。不言而喻,应该避免使用武力、胁迫、欺骗和操纵。少数民族社区和感染艾滋病毒的妇女尤其成为这种虐待行为的目标。各国和国际专业组织都曾试图制定临床指南,以引导卫生专业人员避免这种不当做法。幸存者已在国内和国际法院寻求正义。本文批判性地评估了有关处理这些程序同意的实际、伦理和法律问题的证据。文中还就可能的监管措施提出了建议,这些措施旨在解决虐待问题,同时为那些自由选择接受这些程序的人提供途径。