Visiting Professor in the Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health at Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Senior Lecturer in Law in the Department of Humanities and Law at Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):237-249.
How might the abortion experience look in a world without the existing regulatory constraints? This paper critically assesses the evidence about how a high-quality abortion experience might be achieved in the first trimester. There would need to be positive obligations on states in pursuance of women's reproductive rights. The onus would be on states and state actors to justify interferences and constraints upon a woman's right to terminate in the first trimester of her pregnancy. In this vision, abortion is person-centered and normalized as far as possible. High-quality information about abortion would be freely available through multiple sources and in varying formats. Whenever possible, abortion would happen in a place chosen by the woman, and in the case of medical abortion, could be self-managed with excellent clinical backup on hand should the need arise. The overarching purpose of this paper is to highlight the broader environment and framework of state obligations necessary to underpin the lived experience of abortion.
在没有现有监管限制的情况下,堕胎经历会是什么样子?本文批判性地评估了在孕早期如何实现高质量堕胎体验的证据。国家需要承担追求妇女生殖权利的积极义务。国家和国家行为者有责任证明对妇女在怀孕早期终止妊娠的权利的干涉和限制是合理的。在这种设想中,堕胎尽可能以人为主导和正常化。关于堕胎的高质量信息将通过多种来源和不同格式免费提供。只要有可能,堕胎将在妇女选择的地方进行,如果是药物流产,在需要时可以自行管理,并且可以随时获得极好的临床支持。本文的主要目的是强调支持堕胎体验所必需的更广泛的国家义务环境和框架。