Department of Radiology, Charite Medical School, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universitat Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4794-4802. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06105-y. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
To determine the current situation and future directions of clinical trials and data sharing in radiology.
This survey was conducted between July and September 2018 among European heads of imaging departments and speakers at the Clinical Trials in Radiology sessions at ECR 2015-2018. The survey was approved by the ESR research committee, was administered online, and chi-square tests were used.
The overall response rate was 29% (132/460). Responses were received from institutions in 29 countries. These institutions reported having conducted 429 trials, leading to 332 publications, of which 43% were first and 44% were last authorships by those institutions. For future trials, 98% of respondents (93/95) said they would be interested in sharing data, although only 34% had shared data already (23/68, p < 0.001). The major barriers to data sharing were data protection (78%, 74/95), ethical issues (49%, 47/95), and the lack of a data sharing platform (49%, 47/95). Of the respondents, 89% believed a platform would facilitate data sharing (85/95 vs. 10/95 did not, p < 0.001) and should offer easy data uploading (74%, 70/95), data safety (66%, 63/95), easy communication between providers and re-users (62%, 59/95), and data access policies (56%, 53/95).
A considerable number of imaging trials are being performed and published by radiologists in Europe whilst data sharing is hardly taking place, despite great interest. This is most likely due to data protection and ethical issues, as well as the absence of a data sharing platform.
• Radiologists have performed a considerable number of more than 400 imaging trials in the last 5 years. • Although only 34% of institutions had shared trial data already, 98% are interested in doing so. • Major data sharing barriers are ethics, data protection, and the absence of a sharing platform.
确定放射学临床试验和数据共享的现状和未来方向。
本调查于 2018 年 7 月至 9 月期间在欧洲影像部门负责人和 ECR 2015-2018 年临床放射学会议演讲者中进行。该调查得到了 ESR 研究委员会的批准,通过在线进行,并使用了卡方检验。
总体回复率为 29%(132/460)。来自 29 个国家的机构收到了回复。这些机构报告进行了 429 项试验,导致 332 篇论文发表,其中 43%为第一作者,44%为机构的最后作者。对于未来的试验,98%的受访者(95/95)表示有兴趣共享数据,但只有 34%已经共享了数据(23/68,p<0.001)。数据共享的主要障碍是数据保护(78%,74/95)、伦理问题(49%,47/95)和缺乏数据共享平台(49%,47/95)。受访者中有 89%(85/95)认为平台将促进数据共享(85/95 与 10/95 不认为,p<0.001),并应提供方便的数据上传(74%,70/95)、数据安全(66%,63/95)、提供者和再使用者之间的轻松沟通(62%,59/95)和数据访问策略(56%,53/95)。
尽管有很大的兴趣,但欧洲的放射科医生已经进行了大量的 400 多次影像学试验,并且几乎没有进行数据共享。这很可能是由于数据保护和伦理问题,以及缺乏数据共享平台。
放射科医生在过去 5 年中进行了大量的 400 多次影像学试验。
尽管只有 34%的机构已经共享了试验数据,但有 98%的机构有兴趣这样做。
数据共享的主要障碍是道德、数据保护和缺乏共享平台。