相似文献
1
Ordinary and extraordinary means.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jan 25;292(6515):259-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6515.259.
2
Evolution of Church teaching on prolonging life.教会关于延长生命的教义演变。
Health Prog. 1988 Jan-Feb;69(1):28-35.
3
Acts and omissions, killing and letting die.作为与不作为，杀害与听任死亡。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Jan 11;292(6513):126-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6513.126.
4
Ordinary and extraordinary means and the quality of life.普通和特殊手段与生活质量。
Theol Stud. 1996 Sep;57(3):500-12. doi: 10.1177/004056399605700306.
5
Euthanasia: a Catholic perspective.
Health Prog. 1987 Dec;68(10):28-34, 42.
6
Catholic theology and the "right to die".天主教神学与“死亡权利”
Health Prog. 1985 Mar;66(2):28-32, 48.
7
The development and nature of the ordinary/extraordinary means distinction in the Roman Catholic tradition.罗马天主教传统中普通/非凡手段区分的发展与本质。
Bioethics. 2007 Sep;21(7):386-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00567.x.
8
The ordinary-extraordinary distinction reconsidered: a moral context for the proper calculus of benefits and burdens.对普通与非凡之分的重新审视：利益与负担恰当权衡的道德背景。
HEC Forum. 1990;2(4):219-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00122604.
9
Clinically assisted hydration and the Liverpool Care Pathway: Catholic ethics and clinical evidence.临床辅助补液与利物浦护理路径：天主教伦理与临床证据
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):645-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101533. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Has the sanctity of life law 'gone too far'?: analysis of the sanctity of life doctrine and English case law shows that the sanctity of life law has not 'gone too far'.生命神圣法则是否“走得太远”？：对生命神圣教义和英国判例法的分析表明，生命神圣法则并未“走得太远”。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014 Feb 22;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-9-5.
2
The view of religions toward euthanasia and extraordinary treatments in Japan.日本宗教对安乐死和特殊治疗的看法。
J Relig Health. 2000 Winter;39(4):339-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1010361019006.
3
Medical ethics.医学伦理学
Ulster Med J. 1987 Apr;56(1):1-12.
4
'....officiously to keep alive'.多管闲事地维持生命
Arch Dis Child. 1988 May;63(5):560-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.5.560.
本文引用的文献
1
Saving defective infants: options for life or death.拯救有缺陷的婴儿：生存或死亡的选择。
America (NY). 1983 Apr 23;148(16):313-7.
2
Infant Doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant.
Law Med Health Care. 1983 Oct;11(5):210-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1983.tb00825.x.
3
Children in a persistent vegetative state.处于持续性植物状态的儿童。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Oct 20;289(6451):1022-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6451.1022.
4
Must patients always be given food and water?
Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Oct;13(5):17-21.
5
To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine.救还是不救。现代医学的困境。
JAMA. 1974 Jul 8;229(2):172-6.
6
Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
JAMA. 1985 Apr 19;253(15):2243-5.
Zotero 插件