Von Lersner Ulrike, Gerb Julia, Hizli Serdar, Waldhuber Daniel, Wallerand Anton Felix, Bajbouj Malek, Schomerus Georg, Angermeyer Matthias C, Hahn Eric
Department of Clinical Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Friedrich von Bodelschwingh-Klinik, Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 13;10:46. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00046. eCollection 2019.
Stigma poses an additional burden for people suffering from mental illness, one that often impairs their social participation and can prevent them from seeking adequate help. It is therefore crucial to understand how stigma develops in order to counteract it by setting up effective evidence-based anti-stigma interventions. The present study examines the effect of causal beliefs on stigmatizing behavioral intentions, namely people's desire to distance themselves from persons with mental illness. In addition, we draw cross-cultural comparisons between native Germans and Turkish immigrants to investigate the influence of culture on stigma and causal beliefs and to broaden knowledge on the biggest immigrant group in Germany and on immigrants in Western countries in general. = 302 native Germans and = 173 Turkish immigrants were presented either a depression or a schizophrenia vignette. Then, causal beliefs, emotional reaction and desire for social distance were assessed with questionnaires. Path analyses were carried out to investigate the influence of causal beliefs on the desire for social distance and their mediation by emotional reactions for Germans and Turkish immigrants, respectively. We found an influence of causal beliefs on the desire for social distance. Emotional reactions partly mediated this relationship. Causal attribution patterns as well as the relationship between causal attributions and stigma varied across both subsamples and mental illnesses. In the German subsample, the ascription of unfavorable personal traits resulted in more stigma. In the Turkish immigrant subsample, supernatural causal beliefs increased stigma while attribution to current stress reduced stigma. Our study has implications for future anti-stigma interventions that intend to reduce stigmatization of mentally ill people. Targeting the ascription of unfavorable personal traits and supernatural causal attributions as well as promoting current stress as the cause for mental illness appears to be of particular importance. Also, the mediating influence of emotional responses to causal beliefs needs to be addressed. Furthermore, differential interventions across cultural groups and specific mental illnesses may be appropriate.
污名给患有精神疾病的人带来了额外的负担,这种负担往往会损害他们的社会参与,使他们无法寻求足够的帮助。因此,了解污名是如何形成的,以便通过建立有效的循证反污名干预措施来对抗污名,这一点至关重要。本研究考察了因果信念对污名化行为意图的影响,即人们想要与患有精神疾病的人保持距离的愿望。此外,我们对德国本土人和土耳其移民进行了跨文化比较,以调查文化对污名和因果信念的影响,并拓宽对德国最大移民群体以及一般西方国家移民的认识。302名德国本土人和173名土耳其移民被呈现了一个抑郁症或精神分裂症的案例 vignette 。然后,通过问卷评估因果信念、情绪反应和社交距离的愿望。分别对德国人和土耳其移民进行了路径分析,以研究因果信念对社交距离愿望的影响以及情绪反应在其中的中介作用。我们发现因果信念对社交距离的愿望有影响。情绪反应部分中介了这种关系。因果归因模式以及因果归因与污名之间的关系在两个子样本和两种精神疾病中各不相同。在德国子样本中,将不利的个人特质归因会导致更多的污名。在土耳其移民子样本中,超自然因果信念会增加污名,而将其归因于当前压力则会减少污名。我们的研究对未来旨在减少对精神疾病患者污名化的反污名干预措施具有启示意义。针对不利的个人特质归因和超自然因果归因,以及宣传当前压力是精神疾病的原因,似乎尤为重要。此外,还需要解决情绪反应对因果信念的中介影响。此外,针对不同文化群体和特定精神疾病的差异化干预可能是合适的。