Suppr超能文献

针对多病共存患者的相互作用临床指南的目标驱动管理

Goal-driven management of interacting clinical guidelines for multimorbidity patients.

作者信息

Kogan Alexandra, Tu Samson W, Peleg Mor

机构信息

University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:690-699. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) are based on clinical practice guidelines, which typically address a single morbidity. However, most of the aging population suffers from multiple morbidities. Currently, there is no demonstrated effective mechanism that integrates recommendations from multiple CIGs. We are developing a goal-based method that utilizes knowledge of drugs' physiological effects and therapeutic usage to combine knowledge from CIGs. It incrementally detects interactions and plans non-contradicting therapies. Our algorithm uses patterns to check consistency and respond to events, including data enquiries, diagnoses, adverse events, recommended medications, tests, and goals. Our method utilizes existing standards and CIG tools, including the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) patient data model, SNOMED-CT, and the PROforma CIG formalism with its Alium knowledge-engineering environment and PROforma enactment engine. We demonstrate our approach using a case study involving two clinical guidelines with templates for responding to a new goal and to a medication request that causes an inconsistency which can be automatically detected and resolved based on the knowledge of the two CIGs.

摘要

计算机可解释指南(CIGs)基于临床实践指南,后者通常针对单一疾病。然而,大多数老年人群患有多种疾病。目前,尚无已证明有效的机制来整合来自多个CIGs的建议。我们正在开发一种基于目标的方法,该方法利用药物的生理效应和治疗用途的知识来结合来自CIGs的知识。它逐步检测相互作用并规划不矛盾的治疗方案。我们的算法使用模式来检查一致性并对事件做出响应,包括数据查询、诊断、不良事件、推荐药物、检查和目标。我们的方法利用现有标准和CIG工具,包括快速医疗保健互操作性资源(FHIR)患者数据模型、SNOMED-CT以及具有Alium知识工程环境和PROforma制定引擎的PROforma CIG形式主义。我们通过一个案例研究展示了我们的方法,该案例涉及两个临床指南,其中包含用于响应新目标和药物请求的模板,该药物请求会导致不一致情况,而这种不一致情况可基于两个CIGs的知识自动检测并解决。

相似文献

1
Goal-driven management of interacting clinical guidelines for multimorbidity patients.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:690-699. eCollection 2018.
3
Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):744-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
4
6
Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Jan-Feb;10(1):52-68. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1135.
7
Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;139:22-43.
8
META-GLARE: A meta-system for defining your own computer interpretable guideline system-Architecture and acquisition.
Artif Intell Med. 2016 Sep;72:22-41. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
The use of computer-interpretable clinical guidelines to manage care complexities of patients with multimorbid conditions: A review.
Digit Health. 2018 Oct 3;4:2055207618804927. doi: 10.1177/2055207618804927. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation.
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):159-171. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726502. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing interactions on combining multiple clinical guidelines.
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Sep;81:78-93. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
2
Temporal detection and analysis of guideline interactions.
Artif Intell Med. 2017 Feb;76:40-62. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Cognitive systems at the point of care: The CREDO program.
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Apr;68:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
4
Comprehensive mitigation framework for concurrent application of multiple clinical practice guidelines.
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:52-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):744-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
6
Management of patients with ulcer bleeding.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):345-60; quiz 361. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.480. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
8
The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):433-43. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1264. Epub 2003 Jun 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验