• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在模拟行李安检任务中进行协同搜索。

Collaborative search in a mock baggage screening task.

机构信息

College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work.

School of Psychological Science.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Dec;25(4):716-732. doi: 10.1037/xap0000216. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1037/xap0000216
PMID:30816730
Abstract

Signal detection theory provides models of information integration that allow researchers to predict and benchmark collaborative performance in a visual search task. Naturalistic stimuli, however, may not conform to the simplifying assumptions-specifically, assumptions of equal-variance signal and noise distributions and stochastically independent observers-that are often made to make collaborative signal detection models tractable. Here, we used Bayesian hierarchical modeling of receiver operating characteristics to circumvent this difficulty. Participants ( = 28-32 per experiment) performed a simulated baggage x-ray screening task, working alone or in teams of 2. Team performance was compared with the predictions of 2 versions of a uniform weighting model of information integration, 1 that assumed stochastically independent judgments from the 2 members of a team and 1 that allowed for correlated judgments. Across 4 experiments, teams fell short of the uncorrelated-judgment model's predictions, but outperformed predictions based on the observed correlations in individual judgments. Results imply motivational effects that improve individual searchers' effort under collaborative conditions, or collaborative strategies that effectively decorrelate the individual searchers' judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

信号检测理论提供了信息整合的模型,使研究人员能够预测和基准化视觉搜索任务中的协作表现。然而,自然刺激可能不符合简化的假设——特别是信号和噪声分布的等方差假设,以及随机独立观察者的假设——这些假设通常是为了使协作信号检测模型易于处理而做出的。在这里,我们使用了接收者操作特性的贝叶斯层次建模来规避这一困难。参与者(每个实验 28-32 人)单独或 2 人一组完成模拟行李 X 光筛查任务。团队表现与信息整合的 2 种统一加权模型的预测进行了比较,1 种假设团队中 2 名成员的判断是随机独立的,1 种允许判断相关。在 4 项实验中,团队表现低于不相关判断模型的预测,但优于基于个体判断中观察到的相关性的预测。结果表明存在动机效应,即在协作条件下可以提高个体搜索者的努力程度,或者存在协作策略,可以有效地使个体搜索者的判断去相关。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Collaborative search in a mock baggage screening task.在模拟行李安检任务中进行协同搜索。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019 Dec;25(4):716-732. doi: 10.1037/xap0000216. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Collaboration improves unspeeded search in the absence of precise target information.在缺乏精确目标信息的情况下,协作可改善未加速的搜索。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3387-3401. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02087-y.
3
Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage.旅客行李X光图像的目视检查检测措施。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1297-1311. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-01654-8.
4
Measuring the Efficiency of Automation-Aided Performance in a Simulated Baggage Screening Task.测量自动化辅助性能在模拟行李安检任务中的效率。
Hum Factors. 2022 Sep;64(6):945-961. doi: 10.1177/0018720820983632. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Automation in airport security X-ray screening of cabin baggage: Examining benefits and possible implementations of automated explosives detection.机场行李 X 光安检自动化:自动爆炸物探测的优势和可能实现的探讨。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Oct;72:58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners.视检中的任务时间和任务负荷:一项对 X 光行李安检员进行的为期四个月的现场研究。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Sep;111:103995. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
The wisdom of crowds for visual search.众包在视觉搜索中的应用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 23;114(21):E4306-E4315. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610732114. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
How Realistic Is Threat Image Projection for X-ray Baggage Screening?X射线行李安检中的威胁图像投影有多现实?
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 13;22(6):2220. doi: 10.3390/s22062220.
9
Detecting Bombs in X-Ray Images of Hold Baggage: 2D Versus 3D Imaging.检测托运行李 X 光图像中的爆炸物:2D 与 3D 成像。
Hum Factors. 2019 Mar;61(2):305-321. doi: 10.1177/0018720818799215. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
10
Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening.自动化可靠性、人机系统性能和操作人员合规性:一项使用机场安检员的研究,这些安检员在手提行李安检中得到自动化爆炸物探测系统的支持。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jul;86:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103094. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The joint effect of feedback order and reward schemes on prevalence-induced perceptual decisions.反馈顺序和奖励机制对患病率诱导的感知决策的联合影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;15(1):24908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10707-6.
2
Group efficiency based on the termination rule in the multiple-targets visual search task.基于多目标视觉搜索任务中终止规则的组效率
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):463-471. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02558-5. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Labor division in collaborative visual search: a review.协同视觉搜索中的劳动分工:综述。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1323-1333. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01767-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15.