• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力对浪漫伴侣共情准确性的影响。

The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Utah.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):327-337. doi: 10.1037/fam0000508. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1037/fam0000508
PMID:30816779
Abstract

Accurately understanding the thoughts and feelings of romantic partners, termed empathic accuracy, is critical for optimal relationship functioning. Empathic failure is linked to common reasons couples seek therapy (Doss, Simpson, & Christensen, 2004; Jacobson & Christensen, 1996) and is either implicitly or explicitly a target of many couple therapies (e.g., Jacobson & Christensen, 1996). More specifically, couple therapies target partners' abilities to accurately understand one another preceding and during conflict, periods characterized by high levels of stress. The current study tests the hypothesis that acute stress can be harmful for empathic accuracy in romantic couples, and tests two competing path models of the impact of stress on accuracy. Results show that an acute stressor affected accuracy of men and women differently, impairing accuracy in women but not observably affecting men's accuracy. The effect of the stressor on empathic accuracy for women was mediated by curvilinear arousal, and men's accuracy was also associated with curvilinear arousal. This pattern of results suggests that moderate arousal is optimal for empathic accuracy for both men and women, but this effect was twice as large for women relative to men. These findings point toward potential avenues to improve existing couple therapies by incorporating strategies to mitigate the effects of stress, thereby increasing couples' ability to accurately understand one another in therapy. These findings also suggest strategies for couples to be optimally productive when having important relationship conversations by attending to their level of arousal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

准确理解浪漫伴侣的想法和感受,即共情准确性,对最佳的关系功能至关重要。共情失败与夫妻寻求治疗的常见原因有关(Doss、Simpson 和 Christensen,2004;Jacobson 和 Christensen,1996),并且是许多夫妻治疗的隐含或明确目标(例如,Jacobson 和 Christensen,1996)。更具体地说,夫妻治疗的目标是伴侣在冲突之前和期间准确理解彼此的能力,这是高压力时期的特征。本研究检验了以下假设:急性应激会对浪漫伴侣的共情准确性造成损害,并检验了应激对准确性影响的两种竞争路径模型。结果表明,急性应激源对男性和女性的准确性有不同的影响,会损害女性的准确性,但不会明显影响男性的准确性。应激源对女性共情准确性的影响是由曲线性唤醒介导的,男性的准确性也与曲线性唤醒有关。这种结果模式表明,中等唤醒对男性和女性的共情准确性都是最佳的,但对女性的影响是男性的两倍。这些发现为改善现有的夫妻治疗提供了潜在途径,通过引入减轻压力影响的策略,从而提高夫妻在治疗中准确理解彼此的能力。这些发现还为夫妻在进行重要的关系对话时提供了策略,即关注他们的唤醒水平,以达到最佳效果。

相似文献

1
The effect of stress on empathic accuracy in romantic couples.压力对浪漫伴侣共情准确性的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Apr;33(3):327-337. doi: 10.1037/fam0000508. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Eye of the beholder: the individual and dyadic contributions of empathic accuracy and perceived empathic effort to relationship satisfaction.旁观者之眼:共情准确性和感知共情努力对关系满意度的个体和对偶贡献。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Apr;26(2):236-45. doi: 10.1037/a0027488. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
3
Expressing thoughts and feelings leads to greater empathic accuracy during relationship conflict.表达想法和感受会导致在关系冲突中更准确地共情。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Dec;35(8):1199-1205. doi: 10.1037/fam0000871. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Depression and empathic accuracy in couples: an interpersonal model of gender differences in depression.夫妻中的抑郁和共情准确性:抑郁的性别差异的人际模型。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1033-41. doi: 10.1177/0956797611414728. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
5
Childhood maltreatment and context dependent empathic accuracy in adult romantic relationships.儿童期虐待与成人浪漫关系中情境依赖的共情准确性。
Psychol Trauma. 2018 May;10(3):309-318. doi: 10.1037/tra0000296. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
The Distinct Effects of Empathic Accuracy for a Romantic Partner's Appeasement and Dominance Emotions.伴侣的安抚和支配情绪的共情准确性的独特影响。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jun;31(6):607-622. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904975. Epub 2020 May 18.
7
Now you have my attention: Empathic accuracy pathways in couples and the role of conflict.现在你引起了我的注意:夫妻之间共情准确性的途径以及冲突的作用。
Emotion. 2017 Feb;17(1):155-168. doi: 10.1037/emo0000220. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Within-person variability in relationship satisfaction moderates partners' pain estimation in vulvodynia couples.外阴痛夫妻关系满意度的个体内差异调节伴侣的疼痛估计。
Pain. 2015 Apr;156(4):703-710. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000101.
9
Empathic accuracy and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analytic review.共情准确性与关系满意度:一项元分析综述。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Sep;31(6):742-752. doi: 10.1037/fam0000320. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
10
Intimacy, sexual satisfaction, and sexual distress in vulvodynia couples: An observational study.外阴痛夫妇的亲密关系、性满意度及性困扰:一项观察性研究。
Health Psychol. 2016 Jun;35(6):531-540. doi: 10.1037/hea0000289. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding pathways from feeding difficulties of children to mental health risks of mothers at critical stages of childrearing: Does social support make a difference?了解儿童喂养困难与母亲在育儿关键阶段心理健康风险之间的关联路径:社会支持是否能发挥作用?
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 14;10(18):e37673. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37673. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
2
How individuals perceive their partner's relationship behaviors when worrying about finances.当担心财务问题时,个体如何看待其伴侣的关系行为。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2024 Jun;41(6):1577-1599. doi: 10.1177/02654075241227454. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Exploring Actual and Presumed Links between Accurately Inferring Contents of Other People's Minds and Prosocial Outcomes.
探索准确推断他人心理内容与亲社会结果之间的实际及假定联系。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 26;12(2):13. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020013.
4
Eliciting empathetic drives to prosocial behavior during stressful events.在压力事件中激发亲社会行为的共情驱动力。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:963544. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963544. eCollection 2022.
5
Quarreling After a Sleepless Night: Preliminary Evidence of the Impact of Sleep Deprivation on Interpersonal Conflict.一夜未眠后的争吵:睡眠剥夺对人际冲突影响的初步证据。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(2):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00076-4. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.需求/撤回行为的人际过程模型的复制和扩展:纳入主观情感体验。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Jun;35(4):534-545. doi: 10.1037/fam0000802. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Incorporating physiology into the study of psychotherapy process.将生理学纳入心理治疗过程的研究。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):488-499. doi: 10.1037/cou0000391.