Departamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, BR-05508-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Chemistry Institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel.
Free Radic Biol Med. 2019 May 1;135:210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.02.026. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Peroxynitrite, ONOO, formed in tissues that are simultaneously generating NO and O, is widely regarded as a major contributor to oxidative stress. Many of the reactions involved are catalyzed by CO via formation of an unstable adduct, ONOOC(O)O, that undergoes O-O bond homolysis to produce NO and CO radicals, whose yields are equal at about 0.33 with respect to the ONOO reactant. Since its inception two decades ago, this radical-based mechanism has been frequently but unsuccessfully challenged. The most recent among these [Serrano-Luginbuehl et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol.31:721-730; 2018] claims that ONOOC(O)O is stable, predicts a yield of NO/CO of less than 0.01 under physiological conditions and, contrary to widely accepted viewpoints, suggests that radical generation is inconsequential to peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. Here we review the experimental and theoretical evidence that support the radical model and show this recently proposed alternative mechanism to be incorrect.
过氧亚硝酸盐(ONOO^-)是在同时产生 NO 和 O 的组织中形成的,被广泛认为是氧化应激的主要贡献者。许多涉及的反应都是通过 CO 形成不稳定的加合物(ONOOCC(O)OO)来催化的,该加合物经历 O-O 键均裂,产生 NO 和 CO 自由基,其产率相对于 ONOO 反应物约为 0.33。自二十年前提出以来,这种基于自由基的机制经常受到但未能成功的挑战。最近的一次[ Serrano-Luginbuehl 等人,Chem. Res. Toxicol.31:721-730; 2018]声称 ONOOC(O)O 是稳定的,预测在生理条件下 NO/CO 的产率小于 0.01,并且与广泛接受的观点相反,表明自由基的产生与过氧亚硝酸盐诱导的氧化损伤无关。在这里,我们回顾了支持自由基模型的实验和理论证据,并表明最近提出的替代机制是不正确的。