• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《婚姻质量指数德语版》:在代表性样本和基于人群的常模中的心理测量特性。

The German version of the Quality of Marriage Index: Psychometric properties in a representative sample and population-based norms.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Assessment, University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212758. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0212758
PMID:30818367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6394941/
Abstract

The Quality of Marriage Index (QMI) is a 6-item internationally widely-used instrument assessing relationship satisfaction. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the psychometric properties of the German version in a representative sample of the German general population (N = 1431) as well as (2) effects of gender and age on relationship satisfaction. All participants were in a relationship. The German QMI demonstrates good item characteristics and excellent reliability (α = .94). The proposed one-factor solution was replicated. Differences in scoring on the QMI showed that males scored higher than females and differences between younger and older participants were found. The findings suggest that the German version of the QMI is suitable to reliably measure relationship satisfaction and may therefore be used as a brief screening instrument in a variety of settings and research questions. A cross validation in a sample of couples seeking help for relationship difficulties should be considered in future research. The limited number of items and the one-factor-solution do not suggest this instrument as a fine-tuned assessment tool for different dimensions of relationship satisfaction.

摘要

婚姻质量指数(QMI)是一种国际上广泛使用的 6 项工具,用于评估关系满意度。本研究旨在评估(1)在德国普通人群的代表性样本中,德文版的心理测量学特性(N = 1431),以及(2)性别和年龄对关系满意度的影响。所有参与者都处于恋爱关系中。德国 QMI 表现出良好的项目特征和极好的可靠性(α =.94)。提出的单因素解决方案得到了复制。在 QMI 上的得分差异表明,男性的得分高于女性,并且在年轻和年长参与者之间存在差异。研究结果表明,QMI 的德文版适合可靠地衡量关系满意度,因此可作为各种情况下和研究问题的简要筛选工具。未来的研究中应考虑在寻求解决关系困难的夫妇样本中进行交叉验证。项目数量有限和单因素解决方案并不表明该工具可作为关系满意度不同维度的精细评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/6394941/0e72a57c7ab6/pone.0212758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/6394941/dbd03bdd6d60/pone.0212758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/6394941/0e72a57c7ab6/pone.0212758.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/6394941/dbd03bdd6d60/pone.0212758.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10f3/6394941/0e72a57c7ab6/pone.0212758.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The German version of the Quality of Marriage Index: Psychometric properties in a representative sample and population-based norms.《婚姻质量指数德语版》:在代表性样本和基于人群的常模中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212758. eCollection 2019.
2
The Quality of Marriage Index (QMI): a validation study in infertile patients.婚姻质量指数(QMI):一项针对不孕患者的验证研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 14;12(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4438-2.
3
Validation of the German Version of the Power of Food Scale in a General Population Sample.验证食物力量量表德语版在一般人群样本中的适用性。
Obes Facts. 2019;12(4):416-426. doi: 10.1159/000500489. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
4
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
5
Revised short screening version of the attachment questionnaire for couples from the German general population.修订后的德国普通人群夫妇依恋问卷简短筛查版。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230864. eCollection 2020.
6
General Population Norms for the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale.一般人群慢性疾病治疗功能评估(FACIT)-疲劳量表的常模。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1313-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
Validation of the German version of the insomnia severity index in adolescents, young adults and adult workers: results from three cross-sectional studies.青少年、青年和成年工作者中德语版失眠严重程度指数的验证:三项横断面研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 31;16:174. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0876-8.
8
Quality of life and its related factors in infertile couples.不孕夫妇的生活质量及其相关因素。
J Res Health Sci. 2014 Winter;14(1):57-63.
9
Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Beck hopelessness scale (BHS): results from a German representative population sample.贝克绝望量表(BHS)的心理测量学特性和测量不变性:来自德国代表性人群样本的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 25;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1646-6.
10
The German version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ)--Dimensionality, psychometric properties and population-based norms.《人际需求问卷》(INQ)德文版——维度、心理测量特性及基于人群的常模。
J Affect Disord. 2016 May;195:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of exercise frequency on sexual function and psychological health in infertile women.运动频率对不孕女性性功能和心理健康的影响。
Sex Med. 2025 Sep 10;13(4):qfaf070. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfaf070. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Dyadic coping after cancer diagnosis - a longitudinal cluster analysis.癌症诊断后的二元应对——一项纵向聚类分析
Acta Oncol. 2025 Mar 18;64:431-438. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42561.
3
Gender Differences in Variability in Intimate Relationship Satisfaction: A Secondary Analysis and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Relationship Status and Quality (Family Type) on the Mental Health of Mothers and Their Children: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study.关系状况与质量(家庭类型)对母亲及其子女心理健康的影响:一项为期10年的纵向研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 29;8:266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00266. eCollection 2017.
2
Intimate Relationships Affected by Breast Cancer: Interventions for Couples.受乳腺癌影响的亲密关系:针对伴侣的干预措施。
Breast Care (Basel). 2015 Apr;10(2):102-8. doi: 10.1159/000381966.
3
Marital quality and health: Implications for marriage in the 21 century.
亲密关系满意度变异性中的性别差异:一项二次分析与荟萃分析
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;27(4):1167-1187. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00499-y. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
4
Psychometric properties of dyadic data from the Marital Quality Scale of Indonesian Javanese couples.印尼爪哇族夫妇婚姻质量量表中二元数据的心理测量特性。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Nov 27;36(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00279-7.
5
Prevalence of mental disorders, psychosocial distress, and perceived need for psychosocial support in cancer patients and their relatives stratified by biopsychosocial factors: rationale, study design, and methods of a prospective multi-center observational cohort study (LUPE study).根据生物心理社会因素分层的癌症患者及其亲属的精神障碍患病率、心理社会困扰及心理社会支持的感知需求:一项前瞻性多中心观察性队列研究(LUPE研究)的基本原理、研究设计与方法
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1125545. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125545. eCollection 2023.
6
Relationship satisfaction, feelings of closeness and annoyance, and linkage in electrodermal activity.关系满意度、亲近感和烦恼感与皮肤电活动的联系。
Emotion. 2023 Oct;23(7):1815-1828. doi: 10.1037/emo0001201. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
7
Impact of infertility duration on male sexual function and mental health.不孕持续时间对男性性功能和心理健康的影响。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Aug;39(8):1861-1872. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02550-9. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Changes in sexual behaviour, anxiety symptoms, and quality of couple relationship of patients with infertility during the COVID-19 lockdown.疫情封锁期间不孕患者性行为、焦虑症状和夫妻关系质量的变化。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Feb;39(2):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02361-4. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
The Impact of Postponed Fertility Treatment on the Sexual Health of Infertile Patients Owing to the COVID-19 Pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行导致生育治疗推迟对不孕患者性健康的影响
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 10;8:730994. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.730994. eCollection 2021.
10
Body image in patients with different types of cancer.癌症患者的身体意象。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260602. eCollection 2021.
婚姻质量与健康:对21世纪婚姻的启示。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;23(6):427-432. doi: 10.1177/0963721414549043.
4
Happy Marriage, Happy Life? Marital Quality and Subjective Well-Being in Later Life.幸福婚姻,幸福生活?晚年的婚姻质量与主观幸福感。
J Marriage Fam. 2014 Oct 1;76(5):930-948. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12133.
5
The Marriage Checkup: a randomized controlled trial of annual relationship health checkups.婚姻体检:年度关系健康检查的随机对照试验
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Aug;82(4):592-604. doi: 10.1037/a0037097. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer.系统评价和心理社会干预对夫妻应对癌症的元分析。
Psychooncology. 2013 Aug;22(8):1688-704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Gender, marital power, and marital quality in later life.晚年的性别、婚姻权力与婚姻质量。
J Women Aging. 2011;23(1):3-22. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2011.540481.
8
Factorial invariance of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale across gender.双元调整量表在性别上的因子不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):622-8. doi: 10.1037/a0017572.
9
Dimensionality and reliability of a modified version of Norton's 1983 Quality Marriage Index among expectant and new Canadian mothers'.1983年诺顿质量婚姻指数修订版在加拿大准妈妈和新妈妈群体中的维度及信度
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):379-87. doi: 10.2466/PR0.104.2.379-387.
10
The impact of marital conflict on health and health care utilization in older couples.婚姻冲突对老年夫妇健康及医疗保健利用的影响。
J Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;14(1):9-17. doi: 10.1177/1359105308097938.