• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结清扫术在小(≤ 3cm)肝内胆管细胞癌中的作用。

Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Small (≤ 3 cm) Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzale L. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.

Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1122-1129. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04108-0. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-019-04108-0
PMID:30820796
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The role of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with small intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is still under debate. The aims of this study were to compare the lymph node (LN) status and its correlation with survival among patients with ICC stratified by tumor size.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional series of 259 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery was carried out. Patients were stratified into Small-ICC (≤ 3 cm) and Large-ICC (> 3 cm) based on tumor size.

RESULTS

There were 53 and 206 patients in Small-ICC and Large-ICC groups, respectively. The incidence of LND was 62% among Small-ICC patients and 78% among Large-ICC patients (p = 0.016). LN metastases were identified in 30.3% and 38.5% of Small-ICC and Large-ICC patients, respectively (p = 0.37). No differences in terms of number of harvested LN and LN metastases were identified comparing Small- and Large-ICC patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 52.6% for Small-ICC and 36.2% for Large-ICC (p = 0.024). The 5-year OS according to the LN status (N0 vs N+) was 84.8% and 36.0% (p = 0.032) in Small-ICC, and 45.7% and 12.1% in Large-ICC (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

While Small-ICC patients with no LN metastasis had a good long-term survival, the LN resulted in an important variable associated with survival also for patients in this group. Moreover, the incidence of LN metastasis did not differ when comparing Small-ICC and Large-ICC patients, suggesting that LND is mandatory in the surgical treatment of ICC regardless of tumor size.

摘要

背景与目的

淋巴结清扫术(LND)在小肝内胆管癌(ICC)患者中的作用仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较肿瘤大小分层的 ICC 患者的淋巴结(LN)状态及其与生存的相关性。

方法

对多机构系列 259 例接受根治性手术的患者进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤大小将患者分为小 ICC(≤3cm)和大 ICC(>3cm)。

结果

小 ICC 组和大 ICC 组分别有 53 例和 206 例患者。小 ICC 患者的 LND 发生率为 62%,大 ICC 患者为 78%(p=0.016)。小 ICC 和大 ICC 患者的 LN 转移发生率分别为 30.3%和 38.5%(p=0.37)。小 ICC 和大 ICC 患者的 LN 检出数量和 LN 转移无差异。小 ICC 的 5 年总生存率(OS)为 52.6%,大 ICC 为 36.2%(p=0.024)。根据 LN 状态(N0 与 N+),小 ICC 的 5 年 OS 分别为 84.8%和 36.0%(p=0.032),大 ICC 分别为 45.7%和 12.1%(p<0.001)。

结论

虽然无 LN 转移的小 ICC 患者具有良好的长期生存,但 LN 也是影响这组患者生存的重要因素。此外,小 ICC 和大 ICC 患者的 LN 转移发生率无差异,提示无论肿瘤大小如何,LND 都是 ICC 手术治疗的必要手段。

相似文献

1
Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Small (≤ 3 cm) Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.淋巴结清扫术在小(≤ 3cm)肝内胆管细胞癌中的作用。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1122-1129. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04108-0. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
2
Patterns and prognostic significance of lymph node dissection for surgical treatment of perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部和肝内胆管癌外科治疗中淋巴结清扫的模式和预后意义。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Nov;17(11):1917-28. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2331-1. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
3
Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study.肝内胆管癌准确的淋巴结分期需要充分的淋巴结清扫: 一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8184-8198. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5620. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series.常规淋巴结清扫术可能并不适用于所有肝内胆管细胞癌患者:一项单中心系列研究的结果。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9084-91. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9084.
5
The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival.肝内胆管细胞癌手术后的预后和生存结果:淋巴结转移和淋巴结清扫与生存的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov;16(11):3048-56. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0631-1. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
6
Clinical impact of lymph node dissection in surgery for peripheral-type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.淋巴结清扫术在外周型肝内胆管细胞癌手术中的临床意义。
Surg Today. 2012 Jan;42(2):147-51. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0057-9. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Invasion category-oriented lymph node metastases of cholangiocarcinoma and the prognostic impact.胆管癌侵袭分类相关的淋巴结转移及其预后影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Nov;405(7):989-998. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01955-3. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution.系统性肝门淋巴结清扫术在肝内胆管癌治疗中是否有作用?对一家三级医疗机构17年经验的回顾。
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):666-75. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
9
Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio after resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门周围胆管癌切除术后淋巴结比率的预后意义。
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Apr;13(4):240-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00277.x. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
10
Predictive factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma recurrence in the liver following surgery.肝内胆管癌术后肝脏复发的预测因素
J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;41(9):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s00535-006-1877-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Probability of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients Undergoing Adequate Lymphadenectomy during Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.肝内胆管癌手术中接受充分淋巴结清扫患者的淋巴结转移概率:一项回顾性多中心研究
Liver Cancer. 2024 Oct 16;14(3):260-270. doi: 10.1159/000541646. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The optimal number of examined lymph nodes for cancer specific death of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study.肝内胆管癌癌症特异性死亡的最佳检查淋巴结数目:一项基于人群的研究。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;16(1):531. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02322-8.
3
Lymph node metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the present and prospect of detection and dissection.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in use of lymphadenectomy in surgery with curative intent for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.根治性手术治疗肝内胆管细胞癌中淋巴结切除术的应用趋势。
Br J Surg. 2018 Jun;105(7):857-866. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10827. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
2
Defining Long-Term Survivors Following Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.定义肝内胆管癌切除术后的长期生存者。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1888-1897. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3550-7. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Epidemiology and risk factors: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.流行病学与危险因素:肝内胆管癌
肝内胆管癌的淋巴结转移:检测和清扫的现状与展望。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):1359-1369. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002856. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
4
A personalized prognostic model for long-term survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.肝内胆管癌患者长期生存的个性化预后模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Jul;107(1):16-26. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.1.16. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
Interpretable machine learning-based clinical prediction model for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.基于可解释机器学习的临床预测模型,用于预测肝内胆管细胞癌患者的淋巴结转移。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03223-w.
6
The Oncologic Implications of Tumor Multiplicity in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Its Prognostic Value Might Be Underestimated.肝内胆管细胞癌肿瘤多发性的肿瘤学意义:其预后价值可能被低估。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):948-955. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.290. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Prognostic analysis of patients with combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.根治性切除术后肝细胞癌-胆管细胞癌混合癌患者的预后分析:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 7;28(41):5968-5981. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i41.5968.
8
Effect of lymph node resection on prognosis of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.淋巴结切除对可切除肝内胆管癌预后的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 27;12:957792. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.957792. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of nodal status in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study.肝内胆管癌淋巴结状态评估:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Sep;9(17):1359. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-2785.
10
The role of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.淋巴结清扫在肝内胆管细胞癌中的作用:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01363-4.
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017 Apr;6(2):101-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.02.
4
Liver transplantation for "very early" intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: International retrospective study supporting a prospective assessment.肝移植治疗“极早期”肝内胆管细胞癌:支持前瞻性评估的国际回顾性研究。
Hepatology. 2016 Oct;64(4):1178-88. doi: 10.1002/hep.28744. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database.肝门部胆管癌患者接受扩大肝切除术后淋巴结状态的影响:基于美国国立癌症数据库的综述
HPB (Oxford). 2016 Jan;18(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.006.
6
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognosis of Patients Who Did Not Undergo Lymphadenectomy.肝内胆管癌:未接受淋巴结清扫患者的预后
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Dec;221(6):1031-40.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Proposal of a new staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Analysis of surgical patients from a nationwide survey of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.肝内胆管癌新分期系统的提议:来自日本肝癌研究组全国性调查的手术患者分析
Cancer. 2016 Jan 1;122(1):61-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29686. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
8
Role of surgery in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.手术在肝内胆管癌治疗中的作用。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Aug;19(15):2892-900.
9
Conditional Probability of Long-term Survival After Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 535 Patients.肝内胆管癌肝切除术后长期生存的条件概率:535 例多机构分析。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Jun;150(6):538-45. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0219.
10
Management of lymph nodes during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review.肝细胞癌和肝内胆管癌切除术中淋巴结的管理:一项系统评价
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec;18(12):2136-48. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2667-1. Epub 2014 Oct 10.