Suppr超能文献

慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者模拟雾化和喷雾颗粒沉积的对比研究。

Comparative study of simulated nebulized and spray particle deposition in chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Jul;9(7):746-758. doi: 10.1002/alr.22324. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Topical intranasal drugs are widely prescribed for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), although delivery can vary with device type and droplet size. The study objective was to compare nebulized and sprayed droplet deposition in the paranasal sinuses and ostiomeatal complex (OMC) across multiple droplet sizes in CRS patients using computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

METHODS

Three-dimensional models of sinonasal cavities were constructed from computed tomography (CT) scans of 3 subjects with CRS refractory to medical therapy using imaging software. Assuming steady-state inspiratory airflow at resting rate, CFD was used to simulate 1-µm to 120-µm sprayed droplet deposition in the left and right sinuses and OMC with spray nozzle positioning as in current nasal spray use instructions. Zero-velocity nebulization simulations were performed for 1-µm to 30-µm droplet sizes, maximal sinus and OMC deposition fractions (MSDF) were obtained, and sizes that achieved at least 50% of MSDF were identified. Nebulized MSDF was compared to sprayed droplet deposition. We also validated CFD framework through in vitro experiments.

RESULTS

Among nebulized droplet sizes, 11-µm to 14-µm droplets achieved at least 50% of MSDF in all 6 sinonasal cavities. Four of 6 sinonasal cavities had greater sinus and OMC deposition with nebulized droplets than with sprayed droplets at optimal sizes.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized droplets may target the sinuses and OMC more effectively than sprayed particles at sizes achieving best deposition. Further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary findings. Several commercial nasal nebulizers have average particle sizes outside the optimal nebulized droplet size range found here, suggesting potential for product enhancement.

摘要

背景

尽管药物输送方式因装置类型和液滴大小而异,但局部鼻腔内给药在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)的治疗中仍被广泛应用。本研究的目的是通过计算流体动力学(CFD)比较多种液滴大小下,在 CRS 患者中使用不同喷雾器时,雾化和喷雾的液滴在鼻旁窦和口咽腔复合体(OMC)中的沉积。

方法

使用成像软件,根据 3 例经药物治疗无效的 CRS 患者的 CT 扫描,构建了鼻旁窦腔的三维模型。在静息呼吸率下假设稳定的吸气气流,使用 CFD 模拟 1μm 至 120μm 喷雾液滴在左侧和右侧鼻窦和 OMC 中的沉积,喷雾器位置与当前鼻喷雾剂使用说明书中的位置一致。对 1μm 至 30μm 的液滴大小进行零速度雾化模拟,获得最大鼻窦和 OMC 沉积分数(MSDF),并确定达到至少 50%MSDF 的液滴大小。比较雾化的 MSDF 与喷雾液滴沉积。我们还通过体外实验验证了 CFD 框架。

结果

在雾化液滴大小中,所有 6 个鼻旁窦腔中 11μm 至 14μm 的液滴有至少 50%的 MSDF。在最佳尺寸下,6 个鼻旁窦腔中有 4 个腔的鼻窦和 OMC 沉积量比喷雾粒子更多。

结论

在达到最佳沉积效果的尺寸下,与喷雾粒子相比,雾化液滴可能更有效地靶向鼻窦和 OMC。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的初步发现。这里发现的最佳雾化液滴尺寸范围之外,有几种商业鼻腔雾化器的平均颗粒尺寸,这表明产品有改进的潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验