TNO, Zeist, the Netherlands.
TNO, Zeist, the Netherlands.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 May;127:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
Many food innovations rely on the introduction and use of new or modified proteins. New or modified food proteins may lead to major health risks due to their inherent potential to cause food allergy. Currently, the pre-market allergenicity assessment for new or modified food proteins and protein sources relies on methods for identifying allergenic hazards based on characteristics of known allergens. However, there is no general consensus on the allergenicity parameters to use and the criteria that should apply for the evaluation and decisions to be made. In this paper, we propose that the strategy for allergenicity risk assessment of new or modified food proteins and the methodologies applied should be governed by the risk management questions to be answered, reflected in the information needed by risk managers to enable their informed decision making. We generated an inventory of health outcome-related assessment parameters and criteria potentially important for risk management decision-making and we discuss the implications of selecting different optional criteria (e.g. cut-off values) for what could be accepted as safe with regards to the health outcomes in the (at risk) population. The impact of these various options on both method development and risk management practices was investigated.
许多食品创新依赖于新的或经过修饰的蛋白质的引入和使用。由于新的或经过修饰的食物蛋白具有固有引起食物过敏的潜力,因此可能会带来重大的健康风险。目前,新的或经过修饰的食物蛋白和蛋白源的上市前变应原性评估依赖于基于已知变应原特征来识别变应原危害的方法。然而,对于应使用哪些变应原性参数以及应适用于评估和决策的标准,尚未达成普遍共识。在本文中,我们提出,新的或经过修饰的食物蛋白的变应原性风险评估策略以及应用的方法,应受要回答的风险管理问题的约束,这反映在风险管理人员做出知情决策所需的信息中。我们生成了一份与健康结果相关的评估参数和标准清单,这些参数和标准对于风险管理决策可能很重要,我们还讨论了选择不同可选标准(例如,截止值)对(风险)人群中健康结果可接受的安全性的影响。调查了这些各种选择对方法开发和风险管理实践的影响。