• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

14 种优先致敏性食物的全人群诱发性剂量值及在风险特征描述中应用的建议。

Full range of population Eliciting Dose values for 14 priority allergenic foods and recommendations for use in risk characterization.

机构信息

The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Dec;146:111831. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111831. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111831
PMID:33166672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7864389/
Abstract

Previously, we published selected Eliciting Dose (ED) values (i.e. ED01 and ED05 values) for 14 allergenic foods, predicted to elicit objective allergic symptoms in 1% and 5%, respectively, of the allergic population (Remington et al., 2020). These ED01 and ED05 values were specifically presented and discussed in the context of establishing Reference Doses for allergen management and the calculation of Action Levels for Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL). In the current paper, we publish the full range of ED values for these allergenic foods and provide recommendations for their use, specifically in the context of characterizing risks of concentrations of (unintended) allergenic proteins in food products. The data provided in this publication give risk assessors access to full population ED distribution information for 14 priority allergenic foods, based on the largest threshold database worldwide. The ED distributions were established using broad international consensus regarding suitable datapoints and methods for establishing individual patient's NOAELs and LOAELs and state of the art statistical modelling. Access to these ED data enables risk assessors to use this information for state-of-the-art food allergen risk assessment. This paper contributes to a harmonization of food allergen risk assessment and risk management and PAL practices.

摘要

此前,我们发布了部分过敏原食品的诱发性剂量 (ED) 值(即 ED01 和 ED05 值),这些食品预计会在过敏人群中分别引发 1%和 5%的客观过敏症状 (Remington 等人,2020 年)。这些 ED01 和 ED05 值是在为过敏原管理制定参考剂量和计算预防性过敏原标签 (PAL) 的行动水平的背景下特别提出和讨论的。在当前的论文中,我们公布了这些过敏原食品的完整 ED 值范围,并提供了它们的使用建议,特别是在描述食品中(无意)过敏原蛋白浓度的风险方面。本出版物提供的数据使风险评估人员能够根据全球最大的阈值数据库,获得 14 种优先过敏原食品的全人群 ED 分布信息。ED 分布是基于建立个体患者的 NOAEL 和 LOAEL 以及最先进的统计模型的广泛国际共识而确定的。这些 ED 数据的获取使风险评估人员能够将这些信息用于最先进的食物过敏原风险评估。本文有助于食物过敏原风险评估和风险管理以及 PAL 实践的协调统一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7670/7864389/db8fbdcf208f/nihms-1656124-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7670/7864389/db8fbdcf208f/nihms-1656124-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7670/7864389/db8fbdcf208f/nihms-1656124-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Full range of population Eliciting Dose values for 14 priority allergenic foods and recommendations for use in risk characterization.14 种优先致敏性食物的全人群诱发性剂量值及在风险特征描述中应用的建议。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Dec;146:111831. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111831. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Updated full range of Eliciting Dose values for Cow's milk for use in food allergen risk assessment.更新了用于食物过敏原风险评估的牛奶的完整激发剂量值范围。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Oct;168:113381. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113381. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.更新的用于优先 14 种食物过敏原风险评估的人群最小诱发性剂量分布。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 May;139:111259. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111259. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Symptoms at population Eliciting Doses ≤ED05 for 11 priority allergenic foods are mild to moderate.对于11种优先致敏食物,在引发剂量≤ED05时的症状为轻至中度。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2025 Mar;197:115250. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2025.115250. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
5
Establishment of Reference Doses for residues of allergenic foods: report of the VITAL Expert Panel.致敏性食物残留参考剂量的建立:VITAL 专家小组报告。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 Jan;63:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.10.032. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
Threshold dose distributions for 5 major allergenic foods in children.儿童 5 种主要致敏食物的阈值剂量分布。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Jan;131(1):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy.花生过敏原阈值研究(PATS):一项新的单剂量口服食物挑战研究,旨在验证花生过敏儿童的激发剂量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
The 50th percentile of the general population single eating occasion intake of food is optimal for the calculation of action levels for precautionary allergen labelling.对于预防过敏原标签的行动水平计算而言,一般人群单次进食的食物摄入量的第 50 个百分位数是最佳的。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2023 Sep;179:113953. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113953. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Peanut Can Be Used as a Reference Allergen for Hazard Characterization in Food Allergen Risk Management: A Rapid Evidence Assessment and Meta-Analysis.花生可用作食品过敏原风险管理中危害特征描述的参照过敏原:快速证据评估和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jan;10(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
A Survey of Allergic Consumers and Allergists on Precautionary Allergen Labelling: Where Do We Go from Here?针对过敏消费者和过敏症专科医生的预防性过敏原标签调查:我们该何去何从?
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1556. doi: 10.3390/nu17091556.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-chewing for weaning: A traditional method for allergy prevention? Rationale, study design, and methods of the open-label trial-Solids-by-Kiss.断奶前咀嚼:一种预防过敏的传统方法?开放标签试验“亲吻喂食固体食物”的理论依据、研究设计和方法
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Aug;36(8):e70147. doi: 10.1111/pai.70147.
2
Advances in Shellfish Allergy Therapy: From Current Approaches to Future Strategies.贝类过敏治疗的进展:从当前方法到未来策略
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jul 16;68(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s12016-025-09077-8.
3
Health care resource utilization of patients with asthma and food allergy initiating omalizumab.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Stacked Parametric Survival with Frailty Components and Interval-Censored Failure Times: An Application to Food Allergy Risk.贝叶斯堆叠参数生存分析与脆弱性分量和区间删失失效时间:在食物过敏风险中的应用。
Risk Anal. 2021 Jan;41(1):56-66. doi: 10.1111/risa.13585. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Can we define a level of protection for allergic consumers that everyone can accept?我们能否为过敏消费者定义一个大家都能接受的保护水平?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;117:104751. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104751. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.
开始使用奥马珠单抗治疗的哮喘和食物过敏患者的医疗资源利用情况
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 May 7;4(3):100491. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100491. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
A Survey of Allergic Consumers and Allergists on Precautionary Allergen Labelling: Where Do We Go from Here?针对过敏消费者和过敏症专科医生的预防性过敏原标签调查:我们该何去何从?
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1556. doi: 10.3390/nu17091556.
5
Proteomic Profiling of Celiac-Toxic Motifs and Allergens in Cereals Containing Gluten.含麸质谷物中乳糜泻毒性基序和过敏原的蛋白质组学分析
J Proteome Res. 2025 May 2;24(5):2336-2348. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00456. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
6
Scalable electrochemical system for rapid on-site detection of food allergens.用于快速现场检测食物过敏原的可扩展电化学系统。
Biosens Bioelectron. 2025 Apr 1;273:117142. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117142. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
7
The baked side: Cow's milk and egg protein threshold dose distributions in children reacting to baked milk and baked egg.烘焙方面:对烘焙牛奶和烘焙鸡蛋有反应的儿童中牛奶和鸡蛋蛋白的阈值剂量分布
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Dec 16;18(1):101012. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101012. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Identifying thresholds of reaction for different foods.确定不同食物的反应阈值。
J Food Allergy. 2024 Jul 1;6(1):21-25. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2024.6.240006. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Simulated use of thresholds for precautionary allergen labeling: Impact on prevalence and risk.预防性过敏原标签阈值的模拟使用:对患病率和风险的影响。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 20;10(13):e33316. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33316. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
10
Egg protein exposure estimation in risk assessment for Japanese food allergy labeling.日本食品过敏标签风险评估中的鸡蛋蛋白暴露量估计
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33545. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33545. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
更新:基准剂量法在风险评估中的应用。
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 24;15(1):e04658. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens.更新的用于优先 14 种食物过敏原风险评估的人群最小诱发性剂量分布。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 May;139:111259. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111259. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
5
Deriving individual threshold doses from clinical food challenge data for population risk assessment of food allergens.从临床食物激发数据中推导出个体阈值剂量,用于评估食物过敏原的人群风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;144(5):1290-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.046. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Evidence-based approaches to the application of precautionary allergen labelling: Report from two iFAAM workshops.循证方法在过敏原标签应用中的应用:来自两个 iFAAM 研讨会的报告。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2019 Sep;49(9):1191-1200. doi: 10.1111/cea.13464.
7
Defining the targets for the assessment of IgE-mediated allergenicity of new or modified food proteins.定义新型或改良食品蛋白 IgE 介导变应原性评估的目标。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 May;127:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
8
Sensitivity analysis to derive a food consumption point estimate for deterministic food allergy risk assessment.进行敏感性分析,以获得用于确定性食物过敏风险评估的食物消费点估计值。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2019 Mar;125:413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.01.025. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Accidental allergic reactions in food allergy: Causes related to products and patient's management.食物过敏中的意外过敏反应:与产品相关的原因及患者管理
Allergy. 2018 Dec;73(12):2377-2381. doi: 10.1111/all.13560. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Accidental food allergy reactions: Products and undeclared ingredients.食物过敏反应:产品和未申报成分。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018 Sep;142(3):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.041. Epub 2018 Jul 17.