• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Why food and fluids can never be denied.

作者信息

Derr P G

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):28-30. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.1986.tb02305.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-146x.1986.tb02305.x
PMID:3082799
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Why food and fluids can never be denied.为什么绝不能拒绝食物和液体。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):28-30. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.1986.tb02305.x.
2
When burdens of feeding outweigh benefits.当喂养负担超过益处时。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):30-2. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.1986.tb02306.x.
3
Do feeding tubes have more rights than patients?喂食管拥有的权利比患者还多吗？
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Feb;16(1):26-8.
4
Nutrition and hydration as elective therapy: Brophy and Jobes from an ethical and historical perspective.营养与水合作用作为选择性治疗：从伦理和历史角度看布罗菲与乔贝斯的观点
Issues Law Med. 1986 Jul;2(1):25-38.
5
Philosophical, ethical, and legal aspects of resuscitation medicine. II. Recognizing the tragic choice: food, water, and the right to assisted suicide.复苏医学的哲学、伦理和法律问题。二、认识悲剧性选择：食物、水与协助自杀权。
Crit Care Med. 1988 Oct;16(10):1063-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198810000-00021.
6
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc.
North East Rep Second Ser. 1986 Sep 11;497:626-46.
7
Court responses to withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and fluids.
JAMA. 1985 Apr 19;253(15):2243-5.
8
Being a physician and being ethical.成为一名医生与具备职业道德。
Linacre Q. 1992 Aug;59(3):82-90. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1992.11878172.
9
Withholding and/or withdrawing fluids and nutrition: an opposing view.停止和/或撤除液体与营养：一种反对观点。
Cancer Invest. 1993;11(3):355-7. doi: 10.3109/07357909309024863.
10
The Brophy case: the use of artificial hydration and nutrition.布罗菲案：人工补液与营养的使用
Linacre Q. 1987 May;54(2):63-72. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1987.11877894.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for life-sustaining treatments in advance decisions: a cross-sectional survey of Taiwanese general public.预先决定中对维持生命治疗的偏好：台湾普通民众的横断面调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01242-0.
2
When to Recommend a PEG Tube: A Decision Tree for Clinicians from a Catholic Perspective.何时推荐放置经皮内镜下胃造口管：从天主教视角为临床医生提供的决策树
Linacre Q. 2012 Feb;79(1):25-40. doi: 10.1179/002436312803571500. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
3
The milk and the honey: ethics of artificial nutrition and hydration of the elderly on the other side of Europe.
牛奶与蜂蜜：欧洲另一端老年人人工营养与水化的伦理问题
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):447-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.447.
4
Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.老年医学中的自主权与家长式作风。犹太伦理对为绝症患者提供食物问题及心肺复苏问题的处理方式。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Feb;24(1):44-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.1.44.
5
Withdrawing fluids and nutrition: an alternate way.停止提供液体和营养：一种替代方式。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1988 Jun;64(5):363-75.
6
Physicians' attitudes toward tube feeding chronically ill nursing home patients.医生对长期护理院慢性病患者鼻饲的态度。
J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;7(1):46-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02599102.