Suppr超能文献

经 TIPS 治疗后的食管静脉曲张出血患者 90 天内的再入院率较低:一项全国性关联分析。

Lower 90-day Hospital Readmission Rates for Esophageal Variceal Bleeding After TIPS: A Nationwide Linked Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital.

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, London Health Sciences Center.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;54(1):90-95. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001199.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hospital readmission rates following a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion after an episode of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) has not been well studied. We aimed to address this gap in knowledge on a population level.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to study the readmission rates for patients with decompensated cirrhosis who had a TIPS insertion performed for EVB. The NRD is a national database that tracks patients longitudinally for hospital readmissions. A propensity score matching model was created to match patients who received TIPS with those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 42,679,001 hospital admissions from the 2012 to 2014 NRD sample were analyzed. There were 33,934 patients with EVB who met inclusion criteria for the study, of whom, 1527 (4.5%) received TIPS after EVB and were matched with 1527 patients with EVB who did not undergo TIPS. With a uniform follow-up of 3 months, patients with TIPS were less likely to be readmitted to hospital with a recurrent EVB [odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.47, P<0.01], although were more likely to be readmitted with hepatic encephalopathy (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.31-2.11, P<0.01). At 3 months, there was no difference in all cause hospital readmission rate between the 2 groups (OR: 38.8%; 95% CI: 38.1-44.9 TIPS vs. OR: 41.5%; 95% CI: 34.1-43.3 non-TIPS: P=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large nationally representative study, TIPS insertion after an episode of EVB was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month readmission for recurrent EVB compared with patients who did not receive TIPS. Although those receiving TIPS had a higher rate of hepatic encephalopathy the overall readmission remained unchanged.

摘要

目的

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗食管静脉曲张破裂出血(EVB)后患者的再入院率尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在从人群水平上解决这一知识空白。

方法

利用全国再入院数据库(NRD)研究因 EVB 而行 TIPS 治疗的失代偿性肝硬化患者的再入院率。NRD 是一个跟踪患者住院再入院情况的全国性数据库。创建了倾向评分匹配模型来匹配接受 TIPS 治疗的患者和未接受 TIPS 治疗的患者。

结果

对 2012 年至 2014 年 NRD 样本中的 42679001 例住院治疗进行了分析。共有 33934 例 EVB 患者符合研究纳入标准,其中 1527 例(4.5%)在 EVB 后接受了 TIPS 治疗,并与 1527 例未接受 TIPS 治疗的 EVB 患者进行了匹配。在统一随访 3 个月后,接受 TIPS 治疗的患者再次发生 EVB 的再入院率较低[比值比(OR):0.33,95%置信区间(CI):0.24-0.47,P<0.01],但更有可能因肝性脑病而再次入院[OR:1.66;95% CI:1.31-2.11,P<0.01]。在 3 个月时,两组之间的全因再入院率无差异(OR:38.8%;95% CI:38.1-44.9 TIPS 与 OR:41.5%;95% CI:34.1-43.3 非 TIPS:P=0.17)。

结论

在这项大规模的全国代表性研究中,与未接受 TIPS 治疗的患者相比,EVB 发作后行 TIPS 治疗与 3 个月内再发 EVB 的风险显著降低相关。尽管接受 TIPS 治疗的患者肝性脑病发生率较高,但总体再入院率保持不变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验