• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执业护士将临床决策支持工具和临床移动应用用于处方目的的主题分析。

Thematic analysis of nurse practitioners use of clinical decision support tools and clinical mobile apps for prescriptive purposes.

作者信息

Dodson Crystal Heath, Baker Elizabeth, Bost Kirsten

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.

Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina at Wilmington, Wilmington, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019 Sep;31(9):522-526. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000170.

DOI:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000170
PMID:30829976
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An obstacle to clinical implementation of precision medicine is the absence of easily accessible peer-reviewed, comprehensive clinical practice guidelines. Therefore, an easily accessible format is needed to propel the adoption of these guidelines by healthcare providers. An understanding of the process providers take to prescribe medications will inform development of clinical decision support tools, specifically related to precision medicine. Successful use of mobile applications will depend on the buy-in from healthcare providers. The purpose of this study was to assess perceptions of trustworthiness surrounding clinical decision support tools and mobile applications through interviews with nurse practitioners.

METHODS

A descriptive, qualitative research design was used. A sample of 10 nurse practitioners who actively prescribe medication was used within the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants mentioned both negative and positive attitudes regarding these prescribing techniques. Overall four themes emerged from this thematic analysis: the use of pharmacists to help with current prescribing practices, reliance on the EMR as a clinical decision support tool, lack of mobile app use in clinical practice, but the desire to have these resources if they were affordable and reliable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The participants were aware of the use of mobile apps for clinical decision support, but the adoption of these tools was limited due to the perceived lack of affordability and reliability. Therefore, to overcome these barriers to adoption of a mobile app related to precision medicine, affordability and transparent construction of an app grounded in credible sources must be developed.

摘要

背景与目的

精准医疗临床应用的一个障碍是缺乏易于获取的、经过同行评审的全面临床实践指南。因此,需要一种易于获取的形式来推动医疗服务提供者采用这些指南。了解医疗服务提供者开药的过程将为临床决策支持工具的开发提供信息,特别是与精准医疗相关的工具。移动应用程序的成功使用将取决于医疗服务提供者的认可。本研究的目的是通过对执业护士的访谈来评估对临床决策支持工具和移动应用程序的可信度认知。

方法

采用描述性定性研究设计。研究中使用了10名积极开药的执业护士作为样本。

结论

参与者对这些开药技术既提到了消极态度也提到了积极态度。通过本次主题分析共出现了四个主题:利用药剂师协助当前的开药实践、依赖电子病历作为临床决策支持工具、临床实践中缺乏移动应用程序的使用,但如果这些资源价格合理且可靠则希望拥有。

对实践的启示

参与者了解将移动应用程序用于临床决策支持,但由于认为缺乏可承受性和可靠性,这些工具的采用受到限制。因此,为克服与精准医疗相关的移动应用程序采用的这些障碍,必须开发出价格合理且基于可靠来源构建的透明应用程序。

相似文献

1
Thematic analysis of nurse practitioners use of clinical decision support tools and clinical mobile apps for prescriptive purposes.执业护士将临床决策支持工具和临床移动应用用于处方目的的主题分析。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2019 Sep;31(9):522-526. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000170.
2
Mobile phone apps for clinical decision support in pregnancy: a scoping review.手机应用程序在妊娠临床决策支持中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 12;19(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0954-1.
3
Refinement of a pharmacogenomics app for dosing guidelines for oncology: findings from the usability evaluation.肿瘤学给药指南的药物基因组学应用程序优化:可用性评估结果
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(23):1261. doi: 10.21037/atm-2022-68.
4
Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study.支持初级保健医生参与与初级保健相关的 2 型糖尿病自我管理患者应用程序的因素:访谈研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 16;7(1):e11885. doi: 10.2196/11885.
5
Clinicians' Role in the Adoption of an Oncology Decision Support App in Europe and Its Implications for Organizational Practices: Qualitative Case Study.临床医生在欧洲采用肿瘤学决策支持应用程序中的作用及其对组织实践的影响:定性案例研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 3;7(5):e13555. doi: 10.2196/13555.
6
Transitioning Florida NPs to opioid prescribing.让佛罗里达州的执业护士参与阿片类药物处方工作。
Nurse Pract. 2017 Sep 21;42(9):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000521997.84052.ef.
7
"Providing a complete episode of care": A survey of registered nurse and registered midwife prescribing behaviours and practices.“提供完整的医疗护理”:对注册护士和注册助产士的处方行为和实践的调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):152-162. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15073. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Doctors' Personal Preference and Adoption of Mobile Apps to Communicate with Patients in China: Qualitative Study.中国医生个人偏好与采用移动应用程序与患者沟通的情况:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 10;12:e49040. doi: 10.2196/49040.
9
A survey of nurse practitioner controlled drugs and substances prescribing in three Canadian provinces.对加拿大三个省份的执业护士控制药物和物质处方的调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4342-4356. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15008. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
10
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and testing of an open source mobile application for audiometry test result analysis and diagnosis support.一款用于听力测试结果分析与诊断支持的开源移动应用程序的开发与测试。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99338-5.
2
Refinement of a pharmacogenomics app for dosing guidelines for oncology: findings from the usability evaluation.肿瘤学给药指南的药物基因组学应用程序优化:可用性评估结果
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(23):1261. doi: 10.21037/atm-2022-68.
3
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.