Suppr超能文献

时距后效并不反映对感知时距的适应。

The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration.

机构信息

Utrecht University, Helmholtz Institute, Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Brain and Mind Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0213163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213163. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Recent studies have provided evidence for a role of duration-tuned channels in the encoding of duration. Duration encoding in these channels is thought to reflect the time between responses to the onset and offset of an event. This notion is in apparent conflict with studies that demonstrate that the perceived duration of an event can vary independently from the time separating its perceived onset and offset. Instead, these studies suggest that duration encoding is sensitive to other temporal aspects of a sensory event. In the current study, we investigated whether duration-tuned channels encode duration based on the time between the on- and offset of an event (onset-offset duration), or if they encode a duration corresponding to the perceived duration of that event. We used a duration illusion to dissociate onset-offset duration and perceived duration and measured whether repeated exposure to illusion-inducing stimuli caused adaptation to the onset-offset duration or the perceived duration of these illusion-inducing stimuli. We report clear evidence for adaptation to the onset-offset duration of illusion-inducing stimuli. This finding supports the notion that duration-tuned mechanisms respond to the time between the onset and offset of an event, without necessarily reflecting the duration perceived, and eventually reported by the participant. Implications for the duration channel model and the mechanisms underlying duration illusions are discussed.

摘要

最近的研究为持续时间调谐通道在持续时间编码中的作用提供了证据。这些通道中的持续时间编码被认为反映了对事件开始和结束的响应之间的时间。这一概念与表明事件的感知持续时间可以独立于感知开始和结束之间的时间变化的研究明显矛盾。相反,这些研究表明,持续时间编码对感官事件的其他时间方面敏感。在当前的研究中,我们调查了持续时间调谐通道是否根据事件的开始和结束之间的时间(起始-结束持续时间)来编码持续时间,或者它们是否编码与该事件的感知持续时间相对应的持续时间。我们使用持续时间错觉来分离起始-结束持续时间和感知持续时间,并测量重复暴露于引起错觉的刺激是否会导致对这些引起错觉的刺激的起始-结束持续时间或感知持续时间的适应。我们报告了明确的证据表明对引起错觉的刺激的起始-结束持续时间的适应。这一发现支持了这样的观点,即持续时间调谐机制响应事件开始和结束之间的时间,而不一定反映参与者感知和最终报告的持续时间。讨论了持续时间通道模型和持续时间错觉背后的机制的含义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f735/6398839/7e1c3e86f9b1/pone.0213163.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验