Kauffman James M, Wiley Andrew L, Travers Jason C, Badar Jeanmarie, Anastasiou Dimitris
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Kent State University, OH, USA.
Behav Modif. 2021 Jan;45(1):177-198. doi: 10.1177/0145445519832990. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
The opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case has implications for the education of all students with disabilities. Implications for several categories of disability are discussed: those with autism spectrum disorder and those with disabilities often considered high incidence, particularly those placed for a significant portion of their school day in general education. The aspects of the most relevant to the case are also compared with Article 24 of the United Nations's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The opinion in may affect the course of special education and the role of behavior modification in meeting the needs of all students with disabilities.
美国最高法院对该案件的意见对所有残疾学生的教育都有影响。文中讨论了对几类残疾的影响：患有自闭症谱系障碍的学生以及那些通常被认为是高发病率残疾的学生，特别是那些在学校一天中的大部分时间都在普通教育班级就读的学生。还将该案件最相关的方面与联合国《残疾人权利公约》第24条进行了比较。该案件中的意见可能会影响特殊教育的进程以及行为矫正在满足所有残疾学生需求方面的作用。
