• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿单纯头皮血肿的创伤性脑损伤。

Traumatic brain injury in young children with isolated scalp haematoma.

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Pediatric Emergency, Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide Women's and Babies Division, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jul;104(7):664-669. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316066. Epub 2019 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2018-316066
PMID:30833284
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite high-quality paediatric head trauma clinical prediction rules, the management of otherwise asymptomatic young children with scalp haematomas (SH) can be difficult. We determined the risk of intracranial injury when SH is the only predictor variable using definitions from the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) and Children's Head Injury Algorithm for the Prediction of Important Clinical Events (CHALICE) head trauma rules.

DESIGN

Planned secondary analysis of a multicentre prospective observational study.

SETTING

Ten emergency departments in Australia and New Zealand.

PATIENTS

Children <2 years with head trauma (n=5237).

INTERVENTIONS

We used the PECARN (any non-frontal haematoma) and CHALICE (>5 cm haematoma in any region of the head) rule-based definition of isolated SH in both children <1 year and <2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI; ie, death, neurosurgery, intubation >24 hours or positive CT scan in association with hospitalisation ≥2 nights for traumatic brain injury).

RESULTS

In children <1 year with isolated SH as per PECARN rule, the risk of ciTBI was 0.0% (0/109; 95% CI 0.0% to 3.3%); in those with isolated SH as defined by the CHALICE, it was 20.0% (7/35; 95% CI 8.4% to 36.9%) with one patient requiring neurosurgery. Results for children <2 years and when using rule specific outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In young children with SH as an isolated finding after head trauma, use of the definitions of both rules will aid clinicians in determining the level of risk of ciTBI and therefore in deciding whether to do a CT scan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12614000463673.

摘要

目的

尽管有高质量的儿科头部创伤临床预测规则,但对于无其他症状的年轻头皮血肿(SH)患儿的处理仍存在困难。我们使用儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)和儿童头部创伤重要临床事件预测算法(CHALICE)头部创伤规则的定义,确定 SH 是唯一预测变量时颅内损伤的风险。

设计

一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的计划二次分析。

设置

澳大利亚和新西兰的 10 个急诊部门。

患者

年龄<2 岁的头部创伤患儿(n=5237)。

干预措施

我们使用 PECARN(任何非额部血肿)和 CHALICE(头部任何区域>5cm 的血肿)规则,对年龄<1 岁和<2 岁的患儿定义孤立性 SH。

主要观察结果

临床重要性创伤性脑损伤(ciTBI;即死亡、神经外科手术、>24 小时的插管或与创伤性脑损伤住院≥2 晚相关的阳性 CT 扫描)。

结果

在根据 PECARN 规则诊断为孤立性 SH 的年龄<1 岁的患儿中,ciTBI 的风险为 0.0%(0/109;95%CI 0.0%至 3.3%);根据 CHALICE 定义为孤立性 SH 的患儿中,ciTBI 的风险为 20.0%(7/35;95%CI 8.4%至 36.9%),其中 1 例需要神经外科手术。对于年龄<2 岁的患儿和使用特定规则的结果,结果相似。

结论

在头部创伤后仅发现 SH 的年幼患儿中,使用这两种规则的定义有助于临床医生确定 ciTBI 的风险水平,从而决定是否进行 CT 扫描。

试验注册编号

ACTRN12614000463673。

相似文献

1
Traumatic brain injury in young children with isolated scalp haematoma.小儿单纯头皮血肿的创伤性脑损伤。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jul;104(7):664-669. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316066. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
2
Comparison of Prediction Rules and Clinician Suspicion for Identifying Children With Clinically Important Brain Injuries After Blunt Head Trauma.钝性头部创伤后识别具有临床重要性脑损伤儿童的预测规则与临床医生怀疑程度的比较
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):566-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12923. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE head injury decision rules in children: a prospective cohort study.PECARN、CATCH 和 CHALICE 头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 17;389(10087):2393-2402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30555-X. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
External Validation of the PECARN Head Trauma Prediction Rules in Japan.日本儿科急诊应用研究网络(PECRN)头部创伤预测规则的外部验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;24(3):308-314. doi: 10.1111/acem.13129.
5
Accuracy of Clinician Practice Compared With Three Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study.临床医生实践与三种头部损伤决策规则在儿童中的准确性比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
A prospective observational study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules for children presenting to emergency departments after head injuries (protocol): the Australasian Paediatric Head Injury Rules Study (APHIRST).一项前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估临床决策规则在儿童头部受伤后就诊急诊科时的诊断准确性(方案):澳大利亚儿科头部损伤规则研究(APHIRST)。
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 13;14:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-148.
7
Implementation of adapted PECARN decision rule for children with minor head injury in the pediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊实施改良版 PECARN 决策规则用于治疗轻微头部损伤患儿。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;19(7):801-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
8
Comparison of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE rules for children with minor head injury: a prospective cohort study.小儿轻度头部损伤的PECARN、CATCH和CHALICE规则比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):145-52, 152.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.030. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
9
Comparison of Machine Learning Optimal Classification Trees With the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Head Trauma Decision Rules.机器学习最优分类树与儿科急诊护理应用研究网络头部创伤决策规则的比较。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jul 1;173(7):648-656. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1068.
10
Risk of traumatic brain injuries in children younger than 24 months with isolated scalp hematomas.24个月以下患有单纯头皮血肿的儿童发生创伤性脑损伤的风险。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Traumatic brain injury detection performance of the infant scalp score in children younger than 2 years in the pediatric emergency department.小儿颅脑损伤评分在儿科急诊小于 2 岁患儿中的颅脑损伤检测性能。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1673-1681. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02085-9. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
Non-ionizing Imaging for the Emergency Department Assessment of Pediatric Minor Head Trauma.用于儿科轻度头部创伤急诊科评估的非电离成像
Front Pediatr. 2022 May 11;10:881461. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.881461. eCollection 2022.