Department of Early Childhood Care and Education, University of Kang Ning, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Association for Visual Rehabilitation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 4;9(1):3338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39408-7.
For a reliable visual test, it is important to evaluate the legibility of the symbols, which depends on several factors. Previous studies have compared the legibility of Latin optotypes. This study developed a visual function test based on identification visual capacity for a Chinese reading population. The legibility of word symbols was assessed with three methods: (1) Identification of the contrast thresholds of the character sets, (2) patterns of confusion matrices obtained from analysis of the frequency of incorrect stimulus/response pairs, and (3) pixel ratios of bitmap images of Chinese characters. Then characters of similar legibility in each character set were selected. The contrast thresholds of the final five character sets and the Tumbling E and Landolt C optotypes were evaluated. No significant differences in contrast threshold were found among the five selected character sets (p > 0.05), but the contrast thresholds were significantly higher than those of the E and C optotypes. Our results indicate that combining multiple methods to include the influences of the properties of visual stimuli would be useful in investigating the legibility of visual word symbols.
为了进行可靠的视觉测试,评估符号的易读性非常重要,而符号的易读性取决于几个因素。先前的研究比较了拉丁字母视力测验的易读性。本研究基于中文阅读人群的识别视觉能力,开发了一种视觉功能测试。使用三种方法评估了文字符号的易读性:(1)识别字符集的对比度阈值;(2)分析错误刺激/反应对的频率得到混淆矩阵模式;(3)汉字位图图像的像素比。然后选择每个字符集中具有相似易读性的字符。评估了最终五个字符集和 Tumbling E 和 Landolt C 视力测验的对比度阈值。五个选定字符集之间的对比度阈值没有显著差异(p>0.05),但对比度阈值明显高于 E 和 C 视力测验的对比度阈值。我们的结果表明,结合多种方法来考虑视觉刺激的特性,将有助于研究视觉文字符号的易读性。